This is a response to an interlocutor of mine who pissed me off royally. there is in it much in it of relevance to what we do here on this blog
" I do not see the behavior you discuss as independent of comprehensive material reality. happiness is relative, doing good is relative totally. I did not understand the natural parasitism of the political party that the Bolshevik experience exposed. in that I was late. those who used Marxism to create the Bolshevik reality knew. real politicians always knew.
the parasitism of the political party isn’t independent reality. they must eat to live and political corruption gives them long term security in having something to eat always. Marx said so…the political party is parasitic and corruptible.
the Hungarian people in 1956 came up with an answer, practical! they implemented it and the Bolsheviks smashed them. that generally development proves what I don’t understand about all you talk say…the interdependence relativity of humans and life as a whole that which out of we came and remain part and potential in.
humans have already made the wrong evolutionary choices and I don know if we can undo them, the continuation of capitalism is one such choice, Christianity the same as choosing what the Jews lay before us…Christianity and capitalism basic among much else that is obviously insane like homosexuality abortion, transgenderism etc.
I don’t see those things as choices between bad and good. purely, what the hell is that bad and good. Bad and good do not exist save as factors of debate and description of behavior based in religion limitedly. cause and effect is the relativity here the way of life itself. we must do what is consistent with a survival. we must discover what that is and do it, it is relative to the position we find ourselves in in life. if we have been exploited and are ordinary our behavior is so disciplined by that reality. we must make the evolutionary choices that are consistent with our survival and such choices will help revolutionize life.
technological advance is also basic relative to changing life fundamentally. the overall basic technological development we have achieved has already changed life and is increasingly making working people redundant in life. the capitalist intend to solve that problem by depopulation and revolution from the top down. the working people have no choice but to do the same from the bottom up eliminate the capitalist and organize life for the people. the Hungarians in 1956 demonstrated one way that could be done
so by cause and effect we live…that is the way of nature. you talk with an air of conclusion that divorces one from reality. we were not always here. white people were not always here, were not the first people. there is only one human species. the world was here long before us. conservatively life is around 178 millions years old., by human standards that is a huge quantity of time. but the planet was not always here then what came first the solar system and then planets? and how long ago was that? how long did the solar system take to come into being and set itself up…and where is that currently in its own evolution and life, and what would the anwser to that mean to and for us.
and beyond the solar system what is there. there clearly is a there to that? so what is it?
I don’t see that we can be conclusive to anything the way you are. when I speak of Marxism I know lots that there is to it, all the scam prior to the Rusky Revo and afterwards into all that has gone on to this point. but there is much I found functional in Marxism relatively…relative to many things I did used to do up t now analytically. I live open ended: humans know what we know so far and must come to know as much as possible giving us seemingly our best chance at indefinite survival.
Can humans achieve eternal life even with the Zionist material artificial material synthesis?
can humans come to know all there is to know about existence? I don’t know but as it stands we do not know nearly enough.
the Russian Khazars chose and converted into a Black’s mans religion in the sixth decade of the tenth century Anno Domini.. and began the transformation, religious, that made Jesus white: and then following the whole history of the human species of white origin… false and delusional, that everybody came to believe, setting humanity back a long. long, long, long way, full of ethnic division/racial enmity, ethnic cleansing, utter ‘racial’ hate, that proved often genocidal historically, currently.
the Jewish in the reformation of the Black mans religion made themselves the ‘chosen’ and we can see what that cult has produced in them in us…pure naked and increasing insanity with suicidal drive and impetus. Jim Jones and his religious cohort in Guyana comes to mind
my point is that there is no ‘good’ and ‘evil’ individual factors of what I wonder…religion? Jesus!? God? underpinning any living behavior at all. there must be factual reason cause purpose driving behavior…cause and effect and survival. people don’t just do good or bad. what we need to do to ensure survival we call good. what we call bad is often arbitrary…when we lose out in a project by the action of others with whom we find ourselves in competition. we lost to them so they are bad.
but we then find that we ourselves likely caused or generated the competition – or attack- by what we ourselves did to those people originally that led to their current behavior by which we have lost…prolly dearly
currently popular revolution from the ground up is all that can save the majority of people ordinary humanity from being depopulated, killed off, a process currently under way on planet earth. that would be good behaviour from the people’s POV if they were even aware of it for the most part, of what is happening to them. the depopulation of the majority of humanity is bad behavior on the part of the rich for it can be seen that the survival of a minority over the majority, a minority bent on converting themselves into inanimate material would lead to human extinction soon enough regardless
and that leads us to the real equation of our current day…that between the rich and the ordinary people that is not bridgeable at all! one half of the equation must be eliminated for the existential potential of each side depends on the elimination of the other systematically, socially. didn’t Marx say that? no matter! it is absolutely true! which is why the rich and elite do not hesitate to depopulate the rest of us
the survival if the human species then in whatever systematic organizational formation does not depend on any circular coming into being of elites around the world forever and ever but on the revolutionary activity of ordinary people changing fundamentally the way of life of humanity to eliminate forever the seeming very circular coming into being and going out of existence of social elites. so then the good can come into being which ‘good’ is the survival of ordinary humanity in whom reside the potential for the continuation of the human species in nature"