I don't have time to debunk all of Billy's links, so I'll focus on the first one he's posted today.
Notice that it quotes an "expert" from the "the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons". Notice that the article stresses her credentials. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons sure sounds legitimate!
Of course it does. That's because it's trying to pretend it's The Association of American Physicians or the American Association of Physician Specialists.
Sneaky sneaky.
In reality, Billy's "expert organization" is a phony conservative group funded by libertarian billionaires. It has been barred from academic literature databases (MEDLINE, PUBMED, The Science Database, The National Library of Medcine etc), because it repeatedly ignores the scientific method and says stupid things ("Abortion causes cancer", "Mexicans cause leprosy" etc).
The group is regarded by experts as a being full of crackpots. Quackwatch lists it as a "untrustworthy, non-recommended periodical". Investigative journalist Brian Deer wrote that the journal is the "house magazine of a right-wing American fringe group" and "is barely credible as an independent forum." Writing in The Guardian, science columnist Ben Goldacre described the journal as the "in-house magazine of a rightwing US pressure group and the lobbyists of billionaires."
Notice that Billy is always posting groups linked to conservatives, Republicans, the super rich, the elite and libertarians.
Why? And what is their aim?
Usually naked profits. This group in particular was started with the express aim to "defeat government medicine". ie - to de-legitimize all socialized medicine, welfare and science. This opens the field up for rampant privatization, and removes protections which help the poor and minorities. Its chief funder is itself The Eagle Forum, a conservative group famous for successfully blocking and rolling back civil rights in the 1960s.
The group has numerous ties to the ultra-right wing John Birch society, and most of its prominent members are libertarian, billionaires, Big Tobacco, alt-right types and super-rich Christian evangelists (the group literally believes that, quote, "humanists" have conspired to replace the creation religion of Jehovah with evolution").
Yes, they don't believe in evolution. You'll notice many of the "scientists" Billy cites don't believe in evolution as well.
The group is responsible for much outlandish propaganda over the years ( "Obama is a witch doctor", "Obama practices hypnosis", "hydroxychloroquine stops covid", "Mexicans cause leprosy", "smoking is safe", "the Clintons created AIDS"), typically all aimed at scientists, Democrats, socialized programmes and progressives.
You will notice that Billy is always ranting about capitalism. You will notice that, despite this, his article is written by Dr Jane Orient. Jane Orient sits on the board of countless pro free-market think tanks, and wrote the book "Your Doctor is Not In", which advocates for fully deregulated, privatized health care which is "left up to the dictates of the free market". In a final chapter called "Getting It Right,'' she issues her own plan: (1) remove government regulation, (2) remove welfare and let corporate charities be responsible for the poor (3) cut corporate tax. In other words, it's a Big Business/Conservative argument against pro-social policies, in the tradition of such free-market thinkers as Milton Friedman.
So once again we have the anti-capitalist Billy, falling hook-line-and-sinker for free-market pressure groups. The West Indian Billy, falling hook-line-and-sinker for groups associated with some of the most racist organizations in the USA. The "anti Jew" Billy falling for literal, big business cabals.
That's the real conspiracy, which Billy's conspiracy websites are often designed to obfuscate.
What's interesting is that here he's posting an article in which Dr Jane Orient calls for more covid autopsies (a sensible thing!), which ignores that half the states in America can't legally, or easily, autopsy people because of Republican/conservative policies which either oppose autopsies on religious grounds, or make it harder for scientists to receive organ and body donations, or family consent.
Beyond this, autopsies are dangerous when dealing with covid-infected bodies, and coroners are understaffed and so naturally prioritize cases where cause of death is unknown (or where foul play is involved).
And the people calling for "more autopsies" don't listen to the countless current autopsy studies available anyway.