[size=1.45em]Dravid has a test match century every 7.94 innings[/size]
PROOF: SHIV CHANDERPAUL Has Outplayed Tendulkar, Ricky Ponting & Rahul Dravid
[size=1.45em]Bradman has a test match century every 2.76 innings[/size]
[quote author=boquiesse link=topic=77282.msg479399#msg479399 date=1360270251]
[size=1.45em]P[/size]onting has a test match century every 7.00 innings
[/quote]
6.18...Kallis has a test hundred every 6.18 innings
6.27...Tendulkar
7.00...Ponting
7.9...Dravid
9.2...Shiv
Rev
[size=1.45em]P[/size]onting has a test match century every 7.00 innings
[/quote]
6.18...Kallis has a test hundred every 6.18 innings
6.27...Tendulkar
7.00...Ponting
7.9...Dravid
9.2...Shiv
Rev
I disagree Rev because if a batsman scores 47 in each innings then that is consistency.
The other example is not consistency by definition. Yes it proves he can score big but is that significant?
I do not see 50 or 100 being magical figures in determining consistency.
The other example is not consistency by definition. Yes it proves he can score big but is that significant?
I do not see 50 or 100 being magical figures in determining consistency.
[size=1.45em]Lara has a test match century every 6.82 innings[/size]
[quote author=Mail link=topic=77282.msg479405#msg479405 date=1360270658]
I disagree Rev because if a batsman scores 47 in each innings then that is consistency.
The other example is not consistency by definition. Yes it proves he can score big but is that significant?
I do not see 50 or 100 being magical figures in determining consistency.
[/quote]
Any definition of batting consistency must take into consideration the conversion rate guage.
We know conversion rate is the number of fifties a batsman converts into fifties.
Batting consistency is simply the number of scores over fifty expressed as a percentage of total innings played.
Now mail--put your definition of batting consisteny into words for all to understand---and it must also be quantified.
How do you quantify batting consistency ?
The Rev has used scores over fifty!
[size=14pt]Tell us your definition of batting consistency and show us how it is quantified ?[/size]
Rev
I disagree Rev because if a batsman scores 47 in each innings then that is consistency.
The other example is not consistency by definition. Yes it proves he can score big but is that significant?
I do not see 50 or 100 being magical figures in determining consistency.
[/quote]
Any definition of batting consistency must take into consideration the conversion rate guage.
We know conversion rate is the number of fifties a batsman converts into fifties.
Batting consistency is simply the number of scores over fifty expressed as a percentage of total innings played.
Now mail--put your definition of batting consisteny into words for all to understand---and it must also be quantified.
How do you quantify batting consistency ?
The Rev has used scores over fifty!
[size=14pt]Tell us your definition of batting consistency and show us how it is quantified ?[/size]
Rev
Rev, the great Shiv is not great when it comes to this!!
[size=1.45em]Dravid averages 51.36 at HOME
Dravid averages 53.03 AWAY[/size]
Dravid averages 53.03 AWAY[/size]
[size=1.45em]Tendulkar averages 53.80 at HOME
Tendulkar averages 54.75 AWAY[/size]
Tendulkar averages 54.75 AWAY[/size]
[size=1.45em]Sobers averaged 66.80 at HOME
Sobers averaged 50.73 AWAY[/size]
Sobers averaged 50.73 AWAY[/size]
From The Archives
Older threads about similar topics
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)