[quote author=Kwami link=topic=87168.msg545998#msg545998 date=1390683044]
I would say that an average of 40 is excellent .
This means that your top 6 batsman will score 240 and the tail should score 30 and 270 which is an excellent score on average
[/quote]
I would agree, this is a very fair point.
But that was my point regarding players like Shakib as I said, he doesn't average that much, but he's got to play according to the team - in a weaker side and all that. Yet you can see the times he's won MOTM and all to know how quality a player he is and how he delivers under pressure.
Or hell, even Ross Taylor - as Mailsta said. It's hard to enumerate their contributions.
I essentially agree with you - 40+ with 90 s/r players are quality, no doubt. Regardless of context. But I'm saying that restricting this to average and s/r would make many quality players to miss out too.
I would say that an average of 40 is excellent .
This means that your top 6 batsman will score 240 and the tail should score 30 and 270 which is an excellent score on average
[/quote]
I would agree, this is a very fair point.
But that was my point regarding players like Shakib as I said, he doesn't average that much, but he's got to play according to the team - in a weaker side and all that. Yet you can see the times he's won MOTM and all to know how quality a player he is and how he delivers under pressure.
Or hell, even Ross Taylor - as Mailsta said. It's hard to enumerate their contributions.
I essentially agree with you - 40+ with 90 s/r players are quality, no doubt. Regardless of context. But I'm saying that restricting this to average and s/r would make many quality players to miss out too.