Re: Question on Cricket

In the 47th over of Bangladesh's innings, umpire Rod Tucker ruled

Abdur Razzak out lbw, but the batsman successfully challenged the decision.

The confusion starts here, though.

The ball had gone for what would have been four leg-byes

fine of a square third man, who would have had little chance of fielding

it had the on-field umpire not given the batsman out. [img alt=hocked:]http://www.westindiesforum.com/../Smileys/default/shocked.gif[/img]

However, those leg-byes didn't count, but the ball did.

Wot say ye ?

What IF Bangla had lost by 3 runs :

Could they protest that 4 leg byes NOT given ...????????

but its after the fact on review.

In Tennis , after the review :

The Point is replayed   

yes I would protest the lost runs

I thinks it should have counted

it should have been counted once the decision was overturned and batsman ruled not out.

Well the Rule in Cricket is very clear :

It does NOT count !! 

c'est la vie  :wink:

a French phrase.... "Such is life"

they need to change that rule.  The batting team is getting penalized for the umpire's mistake!  thats not right. 

I am with you.

The Batsman get shaft ....the ball counts :

BUT de Runs do NOT

UDRS , cricket model  ::

dem cheat the banglas