Less
More
-
Posts: 4939
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
10 Nov 2015 13:32 #278068
by dillinger10
George Dobell put together a nice article outlining why England should opt to recall Nick Compton as Alastair Cook's opening partner. I fully expect Alex Hales to be next in line to open the batting, but should he fail, Compton is probably most deserving of a second chance. I do worry about Hales being thrown to the wolves in South Africa, especially against the new ball pairing of Steyn and Morkel. That could very well be a baptism of fire. I know I sound like a broken record, but he really should have opened the batting in the UAE against Pakistan.
www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-engl...nt/story/938997.html
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 4939
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
11 Nov 2015 04:53 #278186
by dillinger10
I think there has to be something to the persistent reports that management/selectors and Compton did not see eye to eye on a number of issues.
In hindsight, this looks like a poor decision. England have been unable to find a partner for Cook and would gladly have taken Compton's average of 31.93 at the top of the order this year. The argument that Compton scored too slowly and that he and Cook together at the top of the order, while scoring runs, did so in a fashion that was too slow in today's modern game only has merit if Cook's free-flowing, dashing partner is actually capable of scoring runs and not getting himself out within the first 10 overs as has been the case with all of Compton's replacements.
Cook, Root, Broad and Anderson have managed to paper over the glaring holes in this England team this year. They are in dire need for finding an opener, a number 3 and a wicket-keeper.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 4939
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
19 Nov 2015 08:33 #279641
by dillinger10
Compton has been named in the squad to face South Africa. It will be interesting to see which way the selectors go. Hales seems the most likely to partner Cook, though they could go with Compton and have Hales bat at three. Either way, it is good to see Compton back in the squad as many, myself included, felt he was somewhat hard done by to have been dropped in the first place.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
19 Nov 2015 09:21 #279656
by ketchim
I am biased on Pedigree ...
talking cricket technique with dad, grandad and brothers while growing in a household .
is truly a revelation !!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 4939
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
26 Dec 2015 17:59 #285352
by dillinger10
Compton was brilliant today in his return. He was defiant and resolute. It was a real throwback innings in very tough batting conditions. He might not be pleasing on the eye and I appreciate that not everyone is a fan of his dogged rearguard defensive qualities, Daryl Cullinan, in particular, voiced his own criticisms of his slow scoring, but he provides the perfect foil for the likes of James Taylor, Joe Root and Ben Stokes, middle-order batsman that score quickly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Mail
-
-
Visitor
-
26 Dec 2015 18:25 #285353
by Mail
Dilly,
As I said to you previously, it makes no sense to me to have Compto in the team batting at 3.
I am a great Halo advocate but he should go at 3 but preferably 5 or 6 for now!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 4939
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
07 Jan 2016 03:58 #286902
by dillinger10
Nick Compton is a real throwback player. He is dogged and determined with a defensive mindset. His main objective is crease occupation. That is in stark contrast to the majority of todays cricketers.
For some historical context, Nick Compton has a current Test strike-rate of 35.45. He has scored at a strike-rate of less than 45 in 18 of his 21 innings. Among all top-order batsmen (Nos. 1-6) who average 35-plus and have played at least 20 innings since 1980, only one batsman has a lower strike rate: New Zealand's John Reid had a scoring rate of 35.31 in 29 innings during this period. Of those in the top 10, no batsman beside Compton have played Test cricket in the last 10 years.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 474
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
07 Jan 2016 05:17 #286905
by pwarbi
There's no doubt that Compton is a talented cricketer and he should have Bern persisted with. The fact he wasn't did call into question for me if there was other issues behind the scenes that we didn't know about.
If there was, they seem to be in the past now and that can only be beneficial for English cricket.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Mail
-
-
Visitor
-
07 Jan 2016 05:49 #286909
by Mail
I think NC should just play his game but when you are desperate to retain your spot your batural game can manifest itself into defence! Much like Nick.
However I think there is a role for him to play. Halo is the attacking option and all the others can bat around Cooky and Compton. Compton makes for setting a sound foundation for the likes of Rooty and Co.
I think the team as it is now shows real balance and so pleased Finn has started to show some real mettle, match fitness and real pace.
My concer is for Halo, but I have no doubts we should stick with him for the the rest of the Summer against SL and PAK.
Hope Wood recovers speedily which will create a dilemma for the selectors. Eyes are on Jimmy as this summer can be his swansong....I suspect.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
West Indies Cricket Fans Forum
-
THE PITCH
-
The case for Nick Compton
Time to create page: 0.233 seconds