- Posts: 93768
- Thank you received: 44
Conspiracy of IPL players :W.I. crisis |
22 Oct 2014 17:07 #219805
by Snoopster
Bro, this whole thing is about one up-manship. Dinas had previously suckered the WICB into a MOU/CBA which was for all intents and purposes was heavily pro-WIPA and anti-WICB. WICB asked him renege and re-negotiate for a CBA on more equal and fair terms. Dinas said "Fcuk you, it's a legally binding agreement". And it stood up in court. The WICB has done the same here to WIPA and they were salivating at their moment of revenge.
But there is a difference between the two. It's subtle but extremely important. The WICB had it's lawyers review the Dinas MOU before it was signed and executed. When they went to court they arbitrator basically said "Are you fcuking serious? You had your lawyers review this before it was signed and now you're saying it's unfair and you want it rescinded? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - no bad faith here, get out out of my court room!!!". ::LOL::
With this MOU however, there may very well be evidence of bad faith conduct by both Hinds and Cameron. If that is proven and it is adjudge Hinds acted in bad faith or outside the scope of his authority as agent of the players, then the MOU is dead dead dead.
Bro, this whole thing is about one up-manship. Dinas had previously suckered the WICB into a MOU/CBA which was for all intents and purposes was heavily pro-WIPA and anti-WICB. WICB asked him renege and re-negotiate for a CBA on more equal and fair terms. Dinas said "Fcuk you, it's a legally binding agreement". And it stood up in court. The WICB has done the same here to WIPA and they were salivating at their moment of revenge.
But there is a difference between the two. It's subtle but extremely important. The WICB had it's lawyers review the Dinas MOU before it was signed and executed. When they went to court they arbitrator basically said "Are you fcuking serious? You had your lawyers review this before it was signed and now you're saying it's unfair and you want it rescinded? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - no bad faith here, get out out of my court room!!!". ::LOL::
With this MOU however, there may very well be evidence of bad faith conduct by both Hinds and Cameron. If that is proven and it is adjudge Hinds acted in bad faith or outside the scope of his authority as agent of the players, then the MOU is dead dead dead.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Oct 2014 11:43 #219898
by Googley
and a good....
and a good....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.229 seconds
| ||||
