Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
11 Sep 2014 10:22 #212376
by mapoui
fuhget rule...eye contact is all. tosss every bowler that look the part of a pelter. pelters will no longer be tolerated >
>
>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
zacaroni
-
-
Visitor
-
11 Sep 2014 11:25 #212400
by zacaroni
A bowler may look like a pelter to one official and look clean to another. How do you resolve that. I think the 15-degree rule is reasonable and objective. The issue is how to enforce it. I hear there will soon be technology available to call illegal actions as they occur. That should solve the problem.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
11 Sep 2014 11:30 #212406
by ketchim
Martin Crowe is like a Gladiator on this matter , listening to that interview !
Is he related to Russel Crowe ...
He threw away his Tape at de ICC meeting :
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
bala24
-
-
Visitor
-
11 Sep 2014 12:57 #212435
by bala24
They have match referees and other guys who just sit there and eat all the foodies.There can't be a technology,but a review of all the balls bowled is a big plus if implemented.
Moreover the angle just varies for each bowler and it is going to be tough to monitor it live.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 4698
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
11 Sep 2014 13:03 #212437
by Snoopster
Maaaaan, when you watch a guy bowl you KNOW when he pelts. It's as obvious and in your faces as Dolly Parton's boobs.
In the old days Umps just simply called it and in almost all cases they were right. This 15 degrees non-sense was implement to legitimized Murali's action. But its effect (unintended or otherwise) is the creation of all these fcuking pelters parading as "mystery spinners". Time to get rid of the 15 degree rule and all these damn pelters with it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
mapoui
-
-
Visitor
-
11 Sep 2014 13:30 #212453
by mapoui
HERE IS TONY GRAY ON THE 15' RULE ABOVE
rule more harmful than helpful
eye contact. we know when a man pelting. toss dem all!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
zacaroni
-
-
Visitor
-
11 Sep 2014 16:54 #212511
by zacaroni
Then why did one umpire call Murali and others didn't. Why do some players go through some games unscathed and get reported in others. With the 15-degree rule you can't just rely on the naked eye. That's why there has been so much confusion.
And the rule became necessary when they found that even Michael Holding, who seemed to have as pure an action as any, had some amount of bend.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 4698
-
Thank you received: 0
-
-
11 Sep 2014 17:06 #212518
by Snoopster
Murli was called BEFORE the implementation of the 15 degree rule. The 15 degree rule was the end result of the ICC's efforts to protect him from being called for throwing after the events that took place in Australia. Look it up.
As for Mikey bending the elbow. You'll convince me when you post a link or any evidence to back it up.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
zacaroni
-
-
Visitor
-
11 Sep 2014 17:48 #212521
by zacaroni
Miky himself admitted this. Dennis Lillee bent his arm too, Allan Donald, Angus Fraser. The only bowler the researchers found to be totally clean was Ramnaresh Sarwan.
Miky was a member of the committee that settled on the 15-degree rule. As was Fraser and Gavaskar, Tim May and others.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
West Indies Cricket Fans Forum
-
THE PITCH
-
The 15 degree rule : 2004
Time to create page: 0.245 seconds