The NEW Coach

U addressing me ? do u hav a comprehension problem OR jus plain stooopid ???

You call taat a Statement ?

When Ignorance is Bliss 'tis folly to be wise ..

Roger Harper also has the "book" qualifications to parallel his on-the-field coaching achievements so far.

Not only does he have the necessary senior coaching certificates, as issued by both the

Marlebourne Cricket Club/National Sports Council in the United Kingdom,

and the West Indies Cricket Board in the Caribbean,

but he has even made it possible to get first hand experience and knowledge of sporting

facilities, practices and attitudes from professional American football (grid iron)

in the United States of America.

He even gleaned some very useful peripheral training in sports psychology.

Judging from what has transpired recently with the West Indies cricket team :

that last qualification could well be the most important of all.  ::LOL::

Clive Lloyd, incidentally Harper's cousin and cricketing mentor, were comparable fieldsmen

in West Indian international cricket.

It can be argued that Harper was even better in the outfield. 

ancient Guyana saying ~  :-*

I have to disagree!  There is no way Harper was good as Clive, muchless better. 

I would argue that Harper and Faoud were in the same class. The big Cat was a class ahead of both of them.

I can give you that one BUT Mark was a better BAT than Faoud ! 

'tall!  nutten go so : :

It doesn't really matters who is the new coach because it wont make much of a difference. An international cricket coach can't make a team start winning games and series. West Indies problem is bigger than coaching it has to do with the players and the selectors.

Arrite ..Mark Harper was more stylish than Carl Hooper