By Rajiv Bisnauth
President Donald Ramotar
President Donald Ramotar
A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) Member of Parliament Dr Rupert Roopnaraine on Saturday revealed that the Cricket Administration Bill does not indicate any possibility of the Government intruding the game here.
WICB president Dave Cameron
WICB president Dave Cameron
Dr Rupert Roopnaraine
Dr Rupert Roopnaraine
He also slammed the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) for the removal of the third Test match between West Indies and New Zealand from Guyana, claiming that the ground used is without proper foundation, ridiculous and a case of very bad judgment.
The Cricket Administration Bill was passed in the National Assembly on May 15, with the support of APNU.
On Monday, the WICB indicated that the third Test match between West Indies and New Zealand, which was scheduled to be played at the Guyana National Stadium, Providence East Bank Demerara from June 26 to 30, has been shifted to Barbados.
This is the second time in three years the WICB has pulled a Test from the Guyana National Stadium because of what they claimed political interference. In 2012, the third Test against Australia was moved to Windsor Park in Dominica.
Also, Regional First-Class games scheduled for Guyana that year were relocated to Dominica.
“I don’t believe that there is any justification given what they are actually talking about…which is that they are against government control of the Guyana Cricket Board (GCB),†Roopnaraine said.
“I don’t see anything in that Bill, and I will say it publically, that indicates any possibility of the government taking control of the GCB. The ground used to remove the third Test is without proper foundation, it’s ridiculous and I think it’s a case of very bad judgment. I am hoping that there will be some room for discussion on the matter so that Guyanese will not again deprive of watching Test cricket,†he said.
Dr Roopnaraine has challenged the WICB to show where in the Bill the government is given power over the Guyana Cricket Board (GCB), since according to him, the Bill, when presented and passed without support from the AFC in Parliament, outlined that very limited role has been given to the Minister of Sport.
The only role the minister has as it relates to the operations of the GCB is to elect a cricket ombudsman, who will oversee the first election. That appointment is done in consultation with the WICB, according to Dr Roopnaraine.
Administrative guidelines
The Cricket Administration Bill seeks to provide legal administrative guidelines for cricket, which, over the years, has become a national sport.
Dr Frank Anthony, who presented the Bill to the National Assembly, had said it was drafted after extensive consultations with all stakeholders, and moreso, following recommendations in a ruling made by the High Court.
The Bill makes it legal for the GCB to be established as a corporate body comprising the Demerara, Essequibo and the Berbice Cricket Boards, all of which will also be made corporate entities.
A section of the Bill will address the issue of phantom voting for the election of persons for administrative positions.
The National Assembly was also told that the Bill provides for better financial accountability. As such, the GCB, under this new legislation will be required to present timely audited financial reports to the National Assembly, as well as the National Sports Commission.
Cold shoulder
Meanwhile, Dr Roopnaraine further indicated that the Select Committee has done everything possible do to engage the WICB before the bill was finalised, but to no avail.
“The WICB did not take up any of the invitations we issued to them from the Select Committee, so I am very disappointed with the decision the WICB has taken. I believe that the WICB ignore all out attempts (the Select Committee) to come and participate with us in crafting the Cricket Administration Bill; we had written to Mr. Cameron and I know that arrangements were been made for Mr. Cameron to come to Guyana or send a representative,†Dr Roopnaraine said.
On May 30, a letter was sent to President Donald Ramotar from WICB president Dave Cameron, raising concerns about the Bill and requesting that the Head of State not assent to it until their concerns are addressed.
Sport Minister Dr Frank Anthony was asked to respond, and the minister wrote to Cameron requesting that he detail all his concerns with regard to the Bill. Cameron pointed out that the response had to be dealt with under the Presidential seal. He then informed Guyana of the decision to remove the match.
Government has since said that it does not discount that the WICB may be looking for a scapegoat in this matter since their agents in Guyana were restrained by a Court Order from acting or holding themselves out as officers of the GCB and as agents of the WICB.
FIRST PUBLISHED IN GUYANA TIMES