South Africa penalised

why  :-\ ........it is alive and well and being practiced in South africa and the West Indies.

In our case it is AfroCaribbean entitlement selection !

in your case it is Quota selection .

do not sweep in under the rug ....Lets expose the nonsense !

sweet ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::!  Saffie Credibility!  Deh nevah had any of that as far as I am concerned

di'ze a laffing matter deh...Saffie credibility.  an Oxymoron!  like Oz credibility..or english fuh dat matter.

::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::
::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::
::LOL:: ::LOL::
::LOL::

Plea of not Kylester, consistency is required.
I know the way I was bought up if you admit guilt the punishment is more lenient. It is something we do quite well not always meaning it, as adults, so we get away.
Specifics or not it was blatantly obvious and the admission of guilt demonstrates intent and we need to be consistent. At least the PCB has made representations to the ICC.
I would suggest if it was an Indian they would be runny shy.

Gina,
That is cop out but I respect your reluctance in discussions of racism.
I think all of us saw the same clips and I did not see any of the match.
However Faf admitted guilt and I believe what people are talking about is consistency of treatment and I have to say there si no consistency.
In my view that is sad and unappreciated.

But she has theTrue but she has the right not to be drawn into a discussion on race.
However that aside, the incident with Faf clearly shows a disparity in ICC application of the rules and I am not saying that is racially motivated but the more I examine all the cases and hear peoples' views you cannot help but wonder.
My issue is consistency without bringing anything else into it.