These concepts are inter-related. If even one of them is achieved, the others would follow. But the state’s rulers, taking advantage of the early deaths of both the Quaid and the Allama, worked to prevent the achievement of any of these goals in the new state. One of the essential constituents of the state, a democratic polity, was sabotaged almost at the very beginning, and the imposition of military rule in 1958 was a culmination of this process rather than something new. The state as originally conceived consisted of the Muslim-majority areas of the subcontinent. However, the first problem was that of Kashmir, and though it had an overwhelming Muslim majority, its people were not allowed to exercise their right of self-determination, something which has been denied to them all these decades, and then there was the separation of East Pakistan from the country the Allama thought of, and the creation of Bangladesh. That process of fragmentation continues, and there is an ongoing attempt to break up the country. By conceiving of a separate homeland for the Muslims, the Allama incurred the hostility of Hindu extremists within India, whose attempt to break up the country he dreamed of, is still going on. Thus the basic problems of the country, which range from failures of welfare through problems with democracy, to failures in implementing Islam, are viewed with glee in India, as evidence that the vision of the Founding Fathers was incorrect, and thus the creation of the state was misguided. The leaders of Pakistan have preferred to follow narrow personal interests rather than implement broad national goals, with the result that the country, far from fulfilling any of the Allama’s hopes, is prey to bad governance, lawlessness and disorder. This merely strengthens the enemies of Pakistan, and does no service to the goals before the nation.