the most obvious and simple rule of existence seems to me the following:
"when a risk contains terminal and irreversible potential it is best to avoid until one is certain either way it can be or go!"
what's with this arguing to the contrary when based on easily verifiable general historical knowledge long in the public domain..THE THE ACCUSED, THE RICH PEOPLE, THE JEWS..ARE EASILY CAPABLE OF DOING THE DEED OF POISONING THE FOOD SUPPLY TO BRING ABOUT POPULATION REDUCTION AS CLAIMED BY SO MANY? :lipsrsealed:
if you eat the damm food and it turns out that it is indeed poisoned you and your family are wiped out. if you force them to prove that it is indeed good food what's there to lose? ::redcard::
what is simply being asked is to lable the blasted food. why wont they? what's there to hide?
why do they insist on releasing the plant products without proper recorded and freely available research into their safety?
does not the major corporation behind GMO foods have a long history of the atrocity and crimes against humanity? :shocked: :shocked: :shocked: :shocked: :shocked:
are you guys truly serious...captain and Kwami?
you both always seemed smarter than that to me :

: :

: :

: :

: :

: :

: