- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
Chairman I Can't Help You! |
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
31 Jul 2021 00:19 - 07 Aug 2021 17:44 #391406
by Billy Shatine
www.cracknewz.com/2021/06/exposed-fauci-...k-in-early-2020.html
EXPOSED: Fauci knew back in early 2020 that covid vaccines threaten to enhance disease
EXPOSED: Fauci knew back in early 2020 that covid vaccines threaten to enhance disease
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 17:44 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 00:29 - 07 Aug 2021 17:45 #391407
by Billy Shatine
truthout.org/video/capitalism-primes-our-bodies-for-illness/
Capitalism Primes Our Bodies for Illness
Capitalism Primes Our Bodies for Illness
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 17:45 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 00:34 - 07 Aug 2021 17:49 #391408
by Billy Shatine
alethonews.com/2021/07/16/covid-start-at...question-everything/
Covid – start at the beginning and question everything
ASKING questions is at the heart of science. Science is not an institution and not an authority. Science is never settled. It is forever evolving through conjecture and criticism. Questions form the basis of all scientific inquiry and scientific progress. Without challenging existing concepts – usually held by a majority – there is no knowledge creation. Censoring dissenting voices eliminates the mechanism of error correction and pushes humanity back into the dark ages.
From the beginning, lockdowns were a questionable public health tool, even described as ‘pro-contagion’ by Professor Ioannidis of Stanford University. As early as June 2020, papers showed that lockdowns and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) had no effect on reducing deaths. We were all aware that lockdowns would have a terrible economic impact and a devastating human toll, especially in the developing world. We went along with this ‘cure’ because we were told it would save lives – it was necessary for two to three weeks to flatten the curve of infections and prevent healthcare system strain. Yet the goalposts kept shifting endlessly, moving towards a ZERO COVID world: a completely unrealistic and unachievable goal.
Is now the time to question absolutely everything?
The US Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organisation and ‘experts’ have flip-flopped multiple times. In February 2020, Anthony Fauci said: ‘In all the history of respiratory-born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person.’ However, all the pandemic measures were based on the assumption that people who are healthy might be sick without knowing it. On June 8, 2020, Maria Van Kerkhove of the WHO stated that asymptomatic spread of SARS-CoV-2 is very rare. The next day she walked back her comment saying that studies, based on computer modelling not real-life data, show that asymptomatic spread is cause f
Covid – start at the beginning and question everything
ASKING questions is at the heart of science. Science is not an institution and not an authority. Science is never settled. It is forever evolving through conjecture and criticism. Questions form the basis of all scientific inquiry and scientific progress. Without challenging existing concepts – usually held by a majority – there is no knowledge creation. Censoring dissenting voices eliminates the mechanism of error correction and pushes humanity back into the dark ages.
From the beginning, lockdowns were a questionable public health tool, even described as ‘pro-contagion’ by Professor Ioannidis of Stanford University. As early as June 2020, papers showed that lockdowns and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) had no effect on reducing deaths. We were all aware that lockdowns would have a terrible economic impact and a devastating human toll, especially in the developing world. We went along with this ‘cure’ because we were told it would save lives – it was necessary for two to three weeks to flatten the curve of infections and prevent healthcare system strain. Yet the goalposts kept shifting endlessly, moving towards a ZERO COVID world: a completely unrealistic and unachievable goal.
Is now the time to question absolutely everything?
The US Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organisation and ‘experts’ have flip-flopped multiple times. In February 2020, Anthony Fauci said: ‘In all the history of respiratory-born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person.’ However, all the pandemic measures were based on the assumption that people who are healthy might be sick without knowing it. On June 8, 2020, Maria Van Kerkhove of the WHO stated that asymptomatic spread of SARS-CoV-2 is very rare. The next day she walked back her comment saying that studies, based on computer modelling not real-life data, show that asymptomatic spread is cause f
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 17:49 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 00:47 - 07 Aug 2021 17:52 #391409
by Billy Shatine
www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-cov...-leak-or-biowarfare/
The Alleged Wuhan Lab-Leak and Its Scientific Skeptics
During most of the last year theories regarding the origins of Covid, whether conspiratorial or otherwise, had disappeared from the public debate, pushed aside by the nationwide Black Lives Matter protests and the final stages of the heated presidential campaign.
In early January, prominent liberal author and public intellectual Nicholson Baker had tried to revive the issue with a 12,000 word cover story in New York magazine, only to see his Covid lab-leak theory swamped and forgotten when the DC Capitol was stormed by a mob of outraged Trumpists two days later.
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
For decades, scientists have been hot-wiring viruses in hopes of preventing a pandemic, not causing one. But what if …?
Nicholson Baker • New York Magazine • January 4, 2021 • 12,000 Words
But then on May 2nd, a revolution occurred after former New York Times science journalist and editor Nicholas Wade published a lengthy article on Medium. His careful 11,000 word analysis mustered the strong evidence that the virus was the artificial product of a human lab, suggesting that it had probably leaked out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, China’s most advanced viral research facility. That laboratory was known to have been working with those types of coronaviruses and was located in Wuhan, the site of the initial outbreak, raising all sorts of obvious suspicions.
The Alleged Wuhan Lab-Leak and Its Scientific Skeptics
During most of the last year theories regarding the origins of Covid, whether conspiratorial or otherwise, had disappeared from the public debate, pushed aside by the nationwide Black Lives Matter protests and the final stages of the heated presidential campaign.
In early January, prominent liberal author and public intellectual Nicholson Baker had tried to revive the issue with a 12,000 word cover story in New York magazine, only to see his Covid lab-leak theory swamped and forgotten when the DC Capitol was stormed by a mob of outraged Trumpists two days later.
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis
For decades, scientists have been hot-wiring viruses in hopes of preventing a pandemic, not causing one. But what if …?
Nicholson Baker • New York Magazine • January 4, 2021 • 12,000 Words
But then on May 2nd, a revolution occurred after former New York Times science journalist and editor Nicholas Wade published a lengthy article on Medium. His careful 11,000 word analysis mustered the strong evidence that the virus was the artificial product of a human lab, suggesting that it had probably leaked out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, China’s most advanced viral research facility. That laboratory was known to have been working with those types of coronaviruses and was located in Wuhan, the site of the initial outbreak, raising all sorts of obvious suspicions.
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 17:52 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 00:51 - 07 Aug 2021 17:55 #391410
by Billy Shatine
alethonews.com/2021/06/24/freedom-vs-the...s-and-their-weapons/
Freedom vs. The Machine; geneticists and their weapons
By Jon Rappoport | No More Fake News | June 24, 2021
Genetic determinism: the belief that an individual’s character, thoughts, and actions are the result of his genes.
Freedom means: being free from, and outside of, ironclad cause and effect.
Which side of the argument will win? Nothing is riding on this…except the future of the human race.
For the past 150 years, genetics has been emerging and taking center stage as the pre-eminent philosophy of life on planet Earth.
For most people, philosophy is of zero concern. They refuse to believe it can influence their lives in any way.
However, we currently have the RNA COVID genetic treatments called vaccines, targeting billions of people. According to the bought-off experts, these destructive treatments are working, in machine-like fashion, to protect us from a phantom virus.
The genetics on which the vaccines are based occupy a distinct philosophic position: our thoughts and actions are the effects of our genes; scientists can interfere with that structure and replace it with another genetic framework, which in turn will impose new all-consuming actions, thoughts, and biological alterations upon us.
One new machine taking over from an older machine.
Freedom vs. The Machine; geneticists and their weapons
By Jon Rappoport | No More Fake News | June 24, 2021
Genetic determinism: the belief that an individual’s character, thoughts, and actions are the result of his genes.
Freedom means: being free from, and outside of, ironclad cause and effect.
Which side of the argument will win? Nothing is riding on this…except the future of the human race.
For the past 150 years, genetics has been emerging and taking center stage as the pre-eminent philosophy of life on planet Earth.
For most people, philosophy is of zero concern. They refuse to believe it can influence their lives in any way.
However, we currently have the RNA COVID genetic treatments called vaccines, targeting billions of people. According to the bought-off experts, these destructive treatments are working, in machine-like fashion, to protect us from a phantom virus.
The genetics on which the vaccines are based occupy a distinct philosophic position: our thoughts and actions are the effects of our genes; scientists can interfere with that structure and replace it with another genetic framework, which in turn will impose new all-consuming actions, thoughts, and biological alterations upon us.
One new machine taking over from an older machine.
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 17:55 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 00:55 - 07 Aug 2021 18:01 #391411
by Billy Shatine
VAX GENOCIDE: COVID VACCINE PROVEN POISONOUS
1) www.bitchute.com/video/frfxGhAcudn9/
2) New Study Confirms: The COVID Shot Spike Protein is Dangerous
vaxxter.com/new-study-confirms-the-covid...rotein-is-dangerous/
1) www.bitchute.com/video/frfxGhAcudn9/
2) New Study Confirms: The COVID Shot Spike Protein is Dangerous
vaxxter.com/new-study-confirms-the-covid...rotein-is-dangerous/
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 18:01 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
31 Jul 2021 08:34 #391414
by chairman
Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/
Good morning
Always tell someone how you feel because opportunities are lost in the blink of an eye but regret can last a lifetime.
cricketwindies.com/forum/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 20:23 - 09 Aug 2021 19:56 #391441
by Billy Shatine
alethonews.com/2021/07/16/covid-start-at...question-everything/
Covid – start at the beginning and question everything
By Abir Ballan | The Conservative Woman | July 15, 2021
ASKING questions is at the heart of science. Science is not an institution and not an authority. Science is never settled. It is forever evolving through conjecture and criticism. Questions form the basis of all scientific inquiry and scientific progress. Without challenging existing concepts – usually held by a majority – there is no knowledge creation. Censoring dissenting voices eliminates the mechanism of error correction and pushes humanity back into the dark ages.
From the beginning, lockdowns were a questionable public health tool, even described as ‘pro-contagion’ by Professor Ioannidis of Stanford University. As early as June 2020, papers showed that lockdowns and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) had no effect on reducing deaths. We were all aware that lockdowns would have a terrible economic impact and a devastating human toll, especially in the developing world. We went along with this ‘cure’ because we were told it would save lives – it was necessary for two to three weeks to flatten the curve of infections and prevent healthcare system strain. Yet the goalposts kept shifting
Covid – start at the beginning and question everything
By Abir Ballan | The Conservative Woman | July 15, 2021
ASKING questions is at the heart of science. Science is not an institution and not an authority. Science is never settled. It is forever evolving through conjecture and criticism. Questions form the basis of all scientific inquiry and scientific progress. Without challenging existing concepts – usually held by a majority – there is no knowledge creation. Censoring dissenting voices eliminates the mechanism of error correction and pushes humanity back into the dark ages.
From the beginning, lockdowns were a questionable public health tool, even described as ‘pro-contagion’ by Professor Ioannidis of Stanford University. As early as June 2020, papers showed that lockdowns and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) had no effect on reducing deaths. We were all aware that lockdowns would have a terrible economic impact and a devastating human toll, especially in the developing world. We went along with this ‘cure’ because we were told it would save lives – it was necessary for two to three weeks to flatten the curve of infections and prevent healthcare system strain. Yet the goalposts kept shifting
Last edit: 09 Aug 2021 19:56 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 20:46 - 07 Aug 2021 18:03 #391442
by Billy Shatine
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 18:03 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Billy Shatine
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1138
- Thank you received: 4
31 Jul 2021 20:49 - 07 Aug 2021 18:05 #391443
by Billy Shatine
TROUBLING SCIENCE EMERGING ON SPIKE PROTEIN BY THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREE
www.bitchute.com/video/0UtDNyvWKM3D/
www.bitchute.com/video/0UtDNyvWKM3D/
Last edit: 07 Aug 2021 18:05 by Billy Shatine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.208 seconds
| ||||
Powered by The Krotek
Copyright © 2022 West Indies Cricket Fans Forum. All rights reserved.
- Menu
- Staff Login