>

ONLY SENSIBLE BRAIN SITTING AS THE COURT OF APPEAL

More
23 Jun 2020 11:47 #382511 by bobby
IN MY OPINION THE ONLY SENSIBLE BRAIN SITTING AS THE COURT OF APPEAL IS THE INDIAN JUDGE BECAUSE HE MADE THE CORRECT DECISION IN MY MIND.
THE OTHER TWO EMBARRASSED THEMSELVES AND IN MY OPINION ARE NOT FIT TO SIT AT THE COURT OF APPEAL, THE HIGHEST COURT IN THE LAND.
APNU, THROUGH ITS SURROGATE WANTS THE COURT TO INTERPRET A PHRASE ABOUT WHICH VOTES SHOULD BE COUNTED....I AM NOT SURPRISED THAT THEY DID NOT APPRECIATE THAT SOMETIMES THE STATUTE IS 'SILENT' IN SOME TERMS BUT THE ANSWER IS QUITE OBVIOUS TO 'BRIGHT' THINKING PEOPLE.
GECOM KNEW THAT THE ONLY VOTES NEEDS COUNTING ARE THE "VALID" OR LEGAL VOTES! THEY APPLIED THAT INTERPRETATION TO THE RECOUNT EXERCISE...SO THIS DECISION BY THE COURT OF APPEAL IS NOT A REVELATION TO THEM...!! GECOM HAS BEEN DOING THAT ALL ALONG IN THE RECOUNT. EXERCISE.
AGAIN ON THE QUESTION OF JURISDICTION...THESE TWO JUDGES OPENED THE 'BACKDOOR' FOR APNU....NOT SURPRISINGLY!!
IT IS CLEAR THAT THE INTERPRETATION AND OTHER ORDERS THEY SOUGHT NEEDS TO BE PURSUED BY WAY OF AN ELECTION PETITION. THIS COURT IS NOT THE FINAL COURT OF APPEAL AS STATED...BECAUSE IN 2004 GUYANA JOINED THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF APPEAL WHICH IS NOW THE FINAL COURT OF APPEAL.
IT IS MY CONTENTION THAT BECAUSE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE WAS TIED TO THE OTHER ORDERS SOUGHT BY APNU...TO SINGLE OUT THIS ONE ITEM WHICH IMPINGES ON THE CHALLENGES TO THE NUMBER OF VOTES...NEEDED TO BE LEFT LIKE THE OTHER ORDERS APNU WANTED FOR AN ELECTION PETITION.....THE COURT DISMISSED THE OTHER ORDERS SOUGHT... ONE, TO PREVENT LOWENFIELD TO SUBMIT HIS REPORT AND ...2...FOR HIM TO DECIDE ON THE QUALITY OF VOTES..

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.169 seconds
Go to top