Facebook : Instagram for $1 billion

ketchim · 04-10-2012, 10:19 AM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
                        [Image: _59568138_insta.png]

#2
Instagram was only launched in October 2010 -

initially just for the iPhone before being offered as an Android app last week.

#3
Pictures were at the heart of Facebook's success :
the easy sharing of pictures made it stand out against early rivals.
Today, the social network is the world's largest photo-sharing website.
Combine Instagram's mobile appeal with some careful Facebook integration (without annoying existing users too much),
and Mark Zuckerberg could have made a very nifty move.
Facebook will have to tread carefully, though...........

#4
i just got instagram and now FB bought it.


geeeex cant they leave things alone

#5
[quote author=~Nargis~ link=topic=65249.msg409436#msg409436 date=1334069301]
i just got instagram and now FB bought it.


geeeex cant they leave things alone
[/quote]

Me too.  But after I downloaded it I've just used it once or twice.  Not a great app as peeps are making it out to be.

#6
Why are communication devices worth so much ? They dont grow food, make garments or produce energy etc. , stuff needed for survival

#7
[quote author=Snoopster link=topic=65249.msg409523#msg409523 date=1334078701]
Me too.  But after I downloaded it I've just used it once or twice.  Not a great app as peeps are making it out to be.
[/quote]

it changes the picture type - not too bad but i dont know why its such a big hit either

#8
[quote author=~Nargis~ link=topic=65249.msg409531#msg409531 date=1334080431]

it changes the picture type - not too bad but i dont know why its such a big hit either
[/quote]

Yep, same here.  I didn't find it to be all that useful.

#9
[quote author=Kwami link=topic=65249.msg409529#msg409529 date=1334079741]
Why are communication devices worth so much ? They dont grow food, make garments or produce energy etc. , stuff needed for survival
[/quote]
It's all artificial (the value and worth).  With facebook, Youtube, twitter etc. their value is supposedly based on the amount of users in their system and the amount of ad revenues they can generate.  The more users the greater the ad revenue.

#10
im starting to hate Facebook

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)