Will Myers comply knowing PNC is dead in the water or will she carry on its legacy?
CASE Dismissed : 24 hour Stay expires !
The rigging machine at GECOM’s executive level was put in place by the pnc since 2015. The only position open was the chair’s position which granger unilaterally tried to appoint but it was overruled by CCJ.
Granger has seized power
res judicata on Monday at 4 !
Today's High Court ruling is paramount to the political existence of our nation. We must be hopeful.
ketchim post=383364 Wrote:res judicata on Monday at 4 !A few hours to go !
Case Dismissed : Recount Results must be declared
and Res Judicata : this case "mirrors" previous one !
and Res Judicata : this case "mirrors" previous one !
https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2020/...re-result/
Chief Justice (Ag), Roxane George -Wiltshire has dismissed the latest application filed
to compel the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM)
to rely on nothing but disputed figures to make the final election’s declarations.
[img ]https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/images/2020/07/CJ-3-768x716.jpg[/img]
Chief Justice (Ag), Roxane George -Wiltshire has dismissed the latest application filed
to compel the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM)
to rely on nothing but disputed figures to make the final election’s declarations.
[img ]https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/images/2020/07/CJ-3-768x716.jpg[/img]
In her ruling yesterday, the CJ determined the figures derived from the recount
of the March 2, 2020 Regional and General Elections are valid and unless overturned by a Court in an election petition
it is the only data that could be used for the declaration.
Justice George-Wiltshire stated too that the previous ten declarations cannot be “resurrected”.
of the March 2, 2020 Regional and General Elections are valid and unless overturned by a Court in an election petition
it is the only data that could be used for the declaration.
Justice George-Wiltshire stated too that the previous ten declarations cannot be “resurrected”.
The CJ said that it is her view that the submissions made on behalf of Jones
the CEO
and the Attorney General (AG) Basil Williams..... were “hopelessly flawed”.
She noted that, in their submissions, all three parties contended that the Section 22 of the Elections Laws
(Amendment) Act No. 15 of 2000 was unconstitutional and based their arguments on a ruling by the CoA.
In this regard, she stressed that the submission on behalf of the applicant, that the CoA’s decision on Section 22
is obiter dicta, cannot be accepted
the CEO
and the Attorney General (AG) Basil Williams..... were “hopelessly flawed”.
She noted that, in their submissions, all three parties contended that the Section 22 of the Elections Laws
(Amendment) Act No. 15 of 2000 was unconstitutional and based their arguments on a ruling by the CoA.
In this regard, she stressed that the submission on behalf of the applicant, that the CoA’s decision on Section 22
is obiter dicta, cannot be accepted
From The Archives
Older threads about similar topics
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)