Quote:You're simply hellbent on blaming any problems that blacks have on the white man.
No. You condescendingly reduce things to issues of will power. ie - the poor would stop being poor if only they "shaped their lives up", or Africa would be better if the "people were less lazy and corrupt" or "West Indies cricket would be better if the individual players were less selfish" etc etc.
This is the opposite of how the world works. Time and time again, studies show that human behaviour is governed by systems. Systems determine human behaviour, not vice versa. Improve the systems, behaviour changes. Who controls the systems? Not Africans.
In your world, people are not buffeted by external factors. For you, everything is a question of WILL POWER. But will is itself largely a myth. What you do is always contingent upon the external.
Imagine you have ten cricketers, and 1 scores regularly because he works hard. We rightfully praise this individual for his skills and will power. But this will is itself always programmed from outside the individual. It doesn't "originate" with him. It is a confluence of accidents (what philosophers call "determinism"). Similarly, it is almost foreordained that the other 9 cricketers suck. It is not that there is "nothing they can do to stop sucking", but that the factors which leads to someone "stopping sucking" never hits them.
Every cricketer cannot will themselves to be talented. Rather, all talented cricketers are already the only ones programmed by forces to become talented.
Does this mean that everyone is subjected to blind fate? No. You can reduce cricketers sucking. You do this by creating order, structure and training camps, thereby reducing chance. You create systems. You create level playing fields.
In Africa, such systems are deliberately destroyed.
![[Image: Kaguta.jpg]](http://www.thelondoneveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Kaguta.jpg)
![[Image: TfRA5owcmBbfsYEEnOjjZd7U.jpg]](http://cdn-01.naij.com/o/TfRA5owcmBbfsYEEnOjjZd7U.jpg)