Quote:Everyone should scam their bosses. Steal and rob. Kill too.
Well my big brother, the same one I already told y'all who called me uncle tom when I was six for saying hello to my white neighbor Mr. Jack, then turned around and bugged out because I stood up to two white guys in a store, and wanted to be a real man to a white strumpet who sucked his wee in an hospital elevator, was also given a job by a black man in the neighborhood running a successful grocery store.
The man paid him a good weekly salary, for somebody with no work history and barely any education, and my brother turned right around and robbed the man blind. Okay now Trini, you telling me that my brother did right? To stab a black man in the back who reached out and tried to help a brother? If you were running your own shop would you want your employees doing that to you?
In a shop I worked a long time ago, also owned by a black man, his register was constantly getting hit by a Puerto Rican kid he had coming in to help out after school. Trini, you telling me that that little f***tard was right to steal from his boss? Well I didn't agree with you and put a stop that kid's bullshit. The owner didn't want to believe that the Puerto Rican boy was doing it, but I kept after him and made him face facts. And after he let the kid go, the cash shortages stopped.
Going by your theory, that everyone should rob and steal from their boss, with business struggling to begin with and the high cost involved with running a business, how does thieving employees help business to flourish? How does it strengthen an economy?
Okay, so we got blacks stabbing each other in the back in the workplace, just as we have blacks stabbing each other in the back in Africa and the NOI stabbed black women and Malcolm X in the back. Okay, now what does the white man have to do with that? Map like to rant about whites not liking blacks everyday, so what does the white man have to do with the traditional pompous backstabbing amongst blacks?
"If you were running your own shop, would you want your employees doing some s*** like that to you?"
I will simplify 20 years of post-neoclassical economic theory for you....
1. All money is issued as debt at interest
2. All this money originates via a convoluted and immoral process involving government bonds and private central banking cartels
3. The end result of this process is that there is always less money in circulation in the system than is owed to the system.
4. In aggregate, debts are thus unpayable and must exponentially increase.
5. To get out of debt, individual human beings must borrow more money (which merely amplifies the problem) or profit off of others.
6. Therefore, for any individual in the system to be out of debt, someone must be in proportional debt. In other words, every dollar out of debt you are, is a violent act against someone else in the system.
7. The above points lead rapidly to bankrupcy, poverty, the pooling of wealth and the crashing of the system. If our system only had 10 people, 2 would own all the wealth and everyone would be broke within a single business cycle. Do the math. Model it yourself.
8. Every economist who models the statistical mechianics of money, from
Peter Victor to Tim Jackson to Adrian Dragulescu to Victor Yakovenko, will show you how their computer models reveal money to be, at any fixed point in time, always zero sum. Their simulations always collapse when time is fast-forwarded.
9. But time is not fixed, the money supply inflates and our system does not collapse.
10. To halt systemic collapse, several things must happen: an exponential increase in production and consumption (and so an exponential increase in global energy requirements and so global resource depletion and so global temperature rises - all unsustainable), an expansion of markets, an increase in poverty (slave labour, unpaid workforces etc), the lowering of wages, the cutting of jobs, the weakening of the local currency (via the inflating money supply), an ever increasing global population upon whom to shunt debt down upon (and the shunting of debt onto future generations as well), mass war, famine, "value" destruction, bankrupcy, bailouts (with more fictional money, again merely prolonging the problem) and a defaulting on owed payments.
Given that money literally makes NO DAMN SENSE (the Latin root of the word "credit" is "faith" or "to belief" - it's a kind of dumb magic), and merely using it exerts pressures and violence on others, what are we to make of your question?
Given that business itself literally makes no sense (the employees as a group INHERENTLY CAN NEVER make enough money to buy back all the products they produce, leading to their being fired and their own company inexorably going bankrupt), what are we to make of your question?
Morality is a social construct. The whole social system in which the employee and employer conduct their transactions is predicated upon immorality. Therefore, society tells us it is not immoral for an employee to steal from an employer. The CONSISTENT thing to do is to rob and kill your employer. Anything else is hypocrisy.
So kill your boss, rob your neighbour and eat your baby. Everyone else doing it. And remember, try not to confine your violence to the present. Bankrupting and abusing your unborn kids, grandkids and great-grandkids is the way to go.
[quote author=TRINIDADDY link=topic=93710.msg597009#msg597009 date=1414729263] "If you were running your own shop, would you want your employees doing some s*** like that to you?"
I will simplify 20 years of post-neoclassical economic theory for you....
1. All money is issued as debt at interest
2. All this money originates via a convoluted and immoral process involving government bonds and private central banking cartels
3. The end result of this process is that there is always less money in circulation in the system than is owed to the system.
4. In aggregate, debts are thus unpayable and must exponentially increase.
5. To get out of debt, individual human beings must borrow more money (which merely amplifies the problem) or profit off of others.
6. Therefore, for any individual in the system to be out of debt, someone must be in proportional debt. In other words, every dollar out of debt you are, is a violent act against someone else in the system.
7. The above points lead rapidly to bankrupcy, poverty, the pooling of wealth and the crashing of the system. If our system only had 10 people, 2 would own all the wealth and everyone would be broke within a single business cycle. Do the math. Model it yourself.
8. Every economist who models the statistical mechianics of money, from
Peter Victor to Tim Jackson to Adrian Dragulescu to Victor Yakovenko, will show you how their computer models reveal money to be, at any fixed point in time, always zero sum. Their simulations always collapse when time is fast-forwarded.
9. But time is not fixed, the money supply inflates and our system does not collapse.
10. To halt systemic collapse, several things must happen: an exponential increase in production and consumption (and so an exponential increase in global energy requirements and so global resource
depletion and so global temperature rises - all unsustainable), an expansion of markets, an increase in poverty (slave labour, unpaid workforces etc), the lowering of wages, the cutting of jobs, the weakening of the local currency (via the inflating money supply), an ever increasing global population upon whom to shunt debt down upon (and the shunting of debt onto future generations as well), mass war, famine, "value" destruction, bankrupcy, bailouts (with more fictional money, again merely prolonging the problem) and a defaulting on owed payments.
Given that money literally makes NO DAMN SENSE (the Latin root of the word "credit" is "faith" or "to belief" - it's a kind of dumb magic), and merely using it exerts pressures and violence on others, what are we to make of your question?
Given that business itself literally makes no sense (the employees as a group INHERENTLY CAN NEVER make enough money to buy back all the products they produce, leading to their being fired and their own company inexorably going bankrupt), what are we to make of your question?
Morality is a social construct. The whole social system in which the employee and employer conduct their transactions is predicated upon immorality. Therefore, society tells us it is not immoral for an employee to steal from an employer. The CONSISTENT thing to do is to rob and kill your employer. Anything else is hypocrisy.
So kill your boss, rob your neighbour and eat your baby. Everyone else doing it. And remember, try not to confine your violence to the present. Bankrupting and abusing your unborn kids, grandkids and great-grandkids is the way to go.
[/quote]
It's important to acknowledge that since you insist that employees should be disloyal to their employers, then you must also feel that your friends, consorts, and family, etc. should be disloyal to you as well and rob and steel from you. Everybody who enters your house should walk out with something you didn't offer them. Every person who you welcome to come near you for any reason at all should dupe you in some way. Perhaps a hit for sex in exchange for a sucker punch in the dark by some dude waiting in the wings for you with her on payday? You put the key in your door, open it and reach for the light switch, and bam! Your ass is laid out from a fist and she and the guy off with your week's salary. And identity thieves should also run their gamut on you. Correct? They charge up TVs n shit in your name that's gonna take you years to pay for.
Hey, as you said....
It all fits into the same economic equation doesn't it?