Bradman's statistics were staggering but Gary was morally outstanding with both bat and ball which his figures do not do complete justice to.Gary's combined impact with bat and ball would edge Bradmans with the bat who was not at his best on wet pitches or against body-line bowling.Sobers played in an era when cricket was more competitive and at his best in a crisis in the most difficult conditions like versus England at Kingston in 1967-68 or when scoring 254 versus Australia at Melbourne.His overall cricketing impact in a single series edged Bradman's in 1970 in England when playing for Rest of the world or in the 1966 series in England.In his best era with the ball Gary was an outstanding bowler.In all types of conditions Sobers to me edged the Don as a cricketer.
In his best era with the ball Gary was an outstanding bowler.In all types of conditions Sobers to me edged the Don as a cricketer.
[/quote]
[size=18pt]Sobers is the greatest allrounder who ever played the game; Bradman is the greatest batsman who ever played the game. They are both Elite Greats. They were the best in their respective eras.
[/size]
A CLOSER LOOK AT SOBERS BATTING:
23.76....This was Sobers average versus NZ in 12 tests----downright mediocre
43.14.... This was Sobers average versus Australia in 19 tests----good
48.83...This was Sobers average in 67 tests versus Aus/Eng/NZ----below 50
BUT, BUT, BUT
* Sobers dominated India and Pakistan---he averaged 83.48 vs India and 89.45 versus Pakistan.
* LOOKS LIKE THE WORLD'S GREATEST ALLROUNDER WAS A SUBCONTINENT BULLY.

* Imagine of Sobers had played against Bangladesh---he would have averaged 1000 against them.

Rev
>