STARC STARTED IT. HE WAS INITIATORY. HIS WAS THE DRANG AND STERM IN THE MATCH, ROILING EMOTION LOOKING FOR EXPRESSION. IT FOUND EXPRESSION IN AN ATTACK ON POLLARD.
if allyuh did not know it before that is violence..incessant, natural white violence that once used to find and still finds full expression in mass murder of people of colour..Indians too.. and aggression on the cricket field allyuh always try explain away as competitiveness.
deh used to say they feared a black man with a ball in he hand when it came to west indian pace. but we were supposed to accept that their violence and aggression on the cricket field, did not refer to the fact that they are always engaged in the mass murder of black people somewhere in the world all the time...that that is not reflected in their cricket behaviour... and that Starc's contemptible and unwarranted initiatory behaviour here is somehow unrelated to general, long standing white violence
and Shastri's behaviour, the way he talks reflects his inate racism. his racist eyesight for he saw only Pollards behaviour standing along, not in relation to Starcs behaviour, not reactive but initiatory itself..even as those here try to break up the sequence, the flow of that event to points at which Pollard could be blamed rather than seeing it whole where it is all Starc..and that the fines should have been in Starc like /Pollard 75%/30%
racism is reflected in how people speak when confronted with issues involving black and white. the inequality is in the language, in how they see the incident and what they do if they are judging the issue. we have to look no further in this issue to slam Shastris as racist for the way he handled it. it is tantamount to Starc walking free and Pollard in jail..WHEN HE DID NOT START A DAMM THING
if allyuh did not know it before that is violence..incessant, natural white violence that once used to find and still finds full expression in mass murder of people of colour..Indians too.. and aggression on the cricket field allyuh always try explain away as competitiveness.
deh used to say they feared a black man with a ball in he hand when it came to west indian pace. but we were supposed to accept that their violence and aggression on the cricket field, did not refer to the fact that they are always engaged in the mass murder of black people somewhere in the world all the time...that that is not reflected in their cricket behaviour... and that Starc's contemptible and unwarranted initiatory behaviour here is somehow unrelated to general, long standing white violence
and Shastri's behaviour, the way he talks reflects his inate racism. his racist eyesight for he saw only Pollards behaviour standing along, not in relation to Starcs behaviour, not reactive but initiatory itself..even as those here try to break up the sequence, the flow of that event to points at which Pollard could be blamed rather than seeing it whole where it is all Starc..and that the fines should have been in Starc like /Pollard 75%/30%
racism is reflected in how people speak when confronted with issues involving black and white. the inequality is in the language, in how they see the incident and what they do if they are judging the issue. we have to look no further in this issue to slam Shastris as racist for the way he handled it. it is tantamount to Starc walking free and Pollard in jail..WHEN HE DID NOT START A DAMM THING