Shillingford suspended from bowling

after one time its 2 Rev...

Bally prolly did not feel threatened by me.  he was prolly confident  I would always be there I guess

next time he was not so sanguine.  still his reaction sophisticated or not seem quite natural to me.  and I believe both boards will live well.

both will prolly inherit a dying sissy although I do not look forward to that day :'( :'(

Quote:i just checked balloil site. No one posting.

there is a flow to Ballys board in which no posts or few posts at a time like this is normal.  it means nothing negative at all.  check back later or tomorrow night and see then.

Indeed I posted several times there today already..and the Rev as well

i like a very fast flowing board with lots of opinions.

I am not afraid of any board.  My stats prove that it wont be long we are the top WEST INDIES CRICKET FORUM.

one thing I really like about yuh board chairman is the music section you put in.  nothing beats that. 

dat was smart

Let us get this in perspective please.

Shillingford was called when he was 19 or so by domestic umpires so this is his third third 'offence'.

There are a few legitimate things the Indians can be rightly accused of but calling Shillingford foul of the rules is down to the umpires and not India, Indians or the BCCI.

If it is felt other international bowlers 'throw' the ball then, I assume, it is an issue for the umpires, rather than anyone else.

I believe Murali was completely exonerated through the same testing in Australia, so unless the equipment used senses race then the results are scientific.

Clearly we need to understand what this 15 degrees arm extension of the elbow really means in practice.

On return from testing this time, like last time, Shillingford looked more round armed so hope he does well in the retest but surely this would totally undermine him.

That Ish Sodhi chap is a real Gem to the Traditional orthodox Spinner  8)

Shilly was also 'called' a few years ago ....... so this is the 3rd time !!!!

The important fact of being called almost 13 years ago is telling.

I do not aim to seem harsh but that is enough time and from quite an informative age to have had the necessary corrections ironed out.

Shillingford stupidee.

He get ban before.

He does pelt.

But Sunil does also pelt.
However to the unclothed eye Shilly flexing more than Sunil.

Shilly shoulda study Sunil so he could see how to get away with it.

Instead he follow Lawson and feel he could pelt with impunity.

where you been , boquiesse ?

nice to read your in depth analysis of the spin twin pelters.... ::LOL::