Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
07 Jul 2016 17:50 #311196
by ketchim
Methink it is a subjective rationale.
Fact is Bangladesh pole vaulted the West Indian legacy
for the CT.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
07 Jul 2016 18:20 #311200
by ketchim
Of course I know it will be used when there is an Agenda driven justification.
To support one player over another !
Disingenuous would be my response
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
07 Jul 2016 18:21 #311201
by ketchim
We should view it as "too bad them guys did not have the pleasure
of playing aginst 3 additional Nations"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 1952
-
Thank you received: 1
-
-
08 Jul 2016 08:33 #311227
by TRINIDADDY
Last time we played Bangla in ODIs we beat tham by 177 runs.
Minnows are real and suck.
In the 1990s you had teams playing Namibia and Kenya. And Zimbabwe, whilst very good when Flower and company played for it, is now total crap.
All runs aren't the same runs.
WI didn't qualify for the Champion's Trophy because of two men: ABDV and Kohli. India went to Bangladesh without Kohli and South Africa went to Bangladesh without ABDV (or any of its frontline bowlers), and so both SA and India got destroyed. That Bangladesh were playing tons of games vs Zim and Afghanistan whilst we were playing nothing, walked out on games and because Pakistan tactically cancelled games, only sent us down the rankings further.
And of course when West Indies plays India and SA, these teams field their best players whilst our team is embroiled in fiascos which sees our players injured, opting out or banned.
Bangladesh deserves to be in the CT because they had an excellent last 2 years of ODI cricket, whilst we ran around like moronically led headless chickens. But they're still minnows, and a half decent WI ODI team will beat even their best team at home.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 11704
-
Thank you received: 20
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
08 Jul 2016 11:12 #311288
by ketchim
Yeah, right ! that W.I was # 8 ranked for the last decade, is testament :
that they are the real MINNOW (small fish) in the 50 over Format !
and a Big Fish (whale, shark, dolphin) in the 20 over Format :-[
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 1952
-
Thank you received: 1
-
-
08 Jul 2016 12:03 #311309
by TRINIDADDY
No, Bangla's always been below us. They're slightly ahead of us now due to fluke and due to our suckiness exceeding previous suckiness levels, which up until that point, had been less sucky than Bangladesh's suckiness.
And with Sanga retired and Pakistan sucking, WI can climb up further. The problem is we have no more ODI games this year (the next ODI is Eng's tour of WI next year?). We don't play enough.
If all goes well, I can see us leapfrogging Pak, Bangla, SL and England in ODIs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 95763
-
Thank you received: 45
-
-
08 Jul 2016 12:46 #311331
by ketchim
TD , how long now (in years) :
have we been below # 4 ICC ranked in the 50 over format ??
1 decade , 2 decades or 3 ??
I know we lost the WC final to India : in 1983 !
thats 33 years ago . Bangla players were NOT born as yet !
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
-
Forum
-
West Indies Cricket Fans Forum
-
THE PITCH
-
Lets put to bed : Minnow status
Time to create page: 0.223 seconds