Another one bites the dust...

That's what I'm saying.  It's the bank's fault.  They were contributory negligent in all of those transactions.

So the 2 Guyanese including the Attorney should be Freed :

And lock up the Bank employee , Constante, for knowingly defrauding his Employer ?

[quote author=ketchim link=topic=79119.msg493153#msg493153 date=1365532999]
So the 2 Guyanese including the Attorney should be Freed :

And lock up the Bank employee , Constante, for knowingly defrauding his Employer ?

[/quote]

Bro they are all at fault including the Bank and its employee.  But in corporate America the Banks are above the fcuking law.  No one will prosecute a bank in the U.S. and A.

great


the barrister getting pounded by the cpa

when i go RH i dont rub up with everyone ;D

Cappo ,

Any Lawyer closing a real estate transaction by receiving Funds from the Bank :

on behalf of the Buyer .....is automatically representing the Bank as well.!!

In the old days the Bank had an independent Lawyer , but that added to the "closing "costs.

So any Lawyer who knowing receives the Money , is guilty :

IF they knew is was a questionable transaction !

For Example ...Snoopster representing me as a Buyer :

Snoopster receives 500 K.from the Bank

The Seller lawyer requests only 300K ...( real price of the house )

I tell Snoopster the extra 200K is to be given to me personally !

Snoopster responsibility is to ALERT the Bank that they are being "Oaklahoma"  :-[

and maybe call the Cops on Me !

Despite the fact I am paying him Lawyers Fee :

and the Bank is paying him Zero...

sad situation in rh

[quote author=ketchim link=topic=79119.msg493391#msg493391 date=1365625688]
Despite the fact I am paying him Lawyers Fee :

and the Bank is paying him Zero...

[/quote]

You as the client still reserve the right for the bank to get it's own lawyer.  Once you explain to the client that it's a joint retainer and that you cannot keep anything confidential between the 2 parties, either party can then say "no I don't consent to a joint retainer" and the other will have to get another solicitor involved.