Referendum and discrimination

krishna · 05-29-2017, 03:25 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#11
are you saying that stabroeks news is controlled by foreign elements

#12
[quote author=CHAIRMAN link=topic=109868.msg738061#msg738061 date=1496087586]
this is about human rights

the government should have the balls to enact the law
[/quote]

this is not about human rights..but about a political program injurious to the best interest of the people of the world, being passed off, enacted, under the rubric of human rights

if america has a human rights problem with bullers in america then let them solve their own problems there ...in america

I grew up in Trinidad and there were no problems with bullers there..none at all. lots were open, had jobs..were not discriminated for jobs, violently abused etc.

the only part of the english speaking west indies I  knew to be openly hostile and violent to bullers was/is the Yard.  they too cyan solve their own problems.  its no ones bizness but their own

#13
[quote author=CHAIRMAN link=topic=109868.msg738064#msg738064 date=1496087798]
are you saying that stabroeks news is controlled by foreign elements
[/quote]

of course.  if the CIA sends them an article to publish will they say no!  they wont.  they will print.  the BG media is a capitalist entity..in sync with the aims and goals of global capitalism.

the starbroek news does not function in the interest of ordinary guyanese.  it functions in the interest of its owners..period

#15
Most adoption agencies discriminate against gay couples and make it incredibly difficult for them to adopt children. Many agencies will only release children to "married" couples, therefore rejecting stable, loving, homosexual parents. By legalizing gay marriage in ALL states, adoption agencies will be forced to grant the same respect and right to homosexual couples. Gay marriage will increase the chances for thousands of foster children to gain loving parents and families.

#16
I agree with the adoption agencies in this regard.  Homosexuality cannot be an accepted human routine behavioral standard, exemplary, for others to emulate.  impossible. it leads nowhere..and at no  time society must set itself up in perpetuation of the homosexual lifestyle.  no adoption!

we accept homosexuality because people are born that way and as life is guaranteed by nature then society must evolve ways that allow all difference to survive while evolution does its job in perfecting the species according to standards that are positive and open  ended.  so while homosexuality remains a factor in the life there must be the guaranteed life liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all including homosexuals

but how in the hell does homosexual pursuit of happiness, life and liberty involve other than homosexuals..how does it go beyond them to involve all of  us so intimately in their lives... that is agreeing to give them carte blanch in society to do as they please... adopt children for example.. who do not have a choice in the matter ::confused::

look here I don't want to be fending off the homosexual advances of other men 2, 3 times a day, as this thing becomes legal and homosexuals appropriate the right to advance on any man they like at any time they want to.  all that is disgusting to me and impinges on my life and my own pursuit of happiness, life and liberty.

and people keep talking about loving homosexuals.  my experience of homosexuals exposed them to be aggressive, brutal and dictatorial, narrow-minded and predatory people, who  want what they want and when rejected can be as nasty and poisonous as any cobra.  and when you look at their political persona as they fight for what they want society to be you see the same attitude in their collective persona.

where is the loving in that ::confused:: 

this loving homosexuals is fantasy to me. I don't see it anywhere at all. 

as a matter of fact loving is a misnomer when attached to, or used to described most of life in exploitative capitalist reality.  routine capitalist reality does not foster loving but competition among humans.. often murderous competition.  any love, loving, that takes root and survives in capitalist reality must be the greatest love of  all, for it lives off nothing, of a life that feeds only that which seeks to replace human love with rapacious competitive consumption

so how homosexuals, a discriminated minority in a rapacious economic reality that masquerades as a society, produce loving people is beyond me. 

homosexuals are what they are supposed to be given the capitalist reality out of which they come..dictatorial, fascist even, totally selfish and predatory..ready to fall on any man who cannot defend himself, keen and sharp ready to exploit any real and perceived weaknesses seen in other men.

in other words homosexuals are capitalist and as such their program to dominate society is capitalist..is comprehensive, totalitarian..aimed at social control not their own minority protection for life, liberty and the pursuit of their own happiness, independently, on their own.  no  sir.  their intent includes us all  in nefarious ways.

I don't agree.  I see the drive to entrench homosexuality in the routine process of society as nefarious plan to help shut down reproduction among heterosexuals, playing into the capitalist plan to reduce global human population... all the better to maintain capitalist control society, in an age of advanced technology that threatens to eliminate most jobs.

homosexuality will not forever be a part of society.  already the relevant sciences have identified the source of homosexuality in interaction of environment and biology.  it is only a matter of time before homosexuality is  prevented from happening in the first place.  so rather than making permanent social  rues altering society in the interest of homosexuality it is best to ensure the development of the science  that prevent homosexuality...unless of course homosexuality is what deh want period

#17
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=109868.msg738080#msg738080 date=1496092116]
and people keep talking about loving homosexuals.  my experience of homosexuals exposed them to be aggressive, brutal and dictatorial, narrow-minded and predatory [/quote]

The giver or the receiver ?

methink they have roles like the 'butch' in 2 feamales !

#18
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=109868.msg738172#msg738172 date=1496180118]
The giver or the receiver ?

methink they have roles like the 'butch' in 2 feamales !
[/quote]

man running around Toronto for a long time I saw a lot of the city life.  that is why I am so adamant about homos male and female.  you ever see a butch beat up a feminine type..I mean serious cutarse, out in the open fuh everybody to see..2 white women ::confused::

dat happens all the time.  there is little difference as I have seen it in the nature of relationship between males/females, female/females, male/males. they talk about loving homosexual relationship.  there may be some who knows.  but their is relationship war among all orientations..serious things man, violent things

there is no difference in any way at all between homos and regular people..BREEDERS..as far as I see.  how can they be ::confused::

they are of the same society, have to deal with all the distorting social problems that twists personality out of shape, turn decent people starting out into devils in short order

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)