Court urges Hindus and Muslims to talk

The dispute reached a flashpoint in 1992 when a Hindu mob destroyed a mosque

at the site which was built in 1528

The court was responding to litigation seeking daily hearings in a long-running

case about the disputed site in the northern town of Ayodhya.

Hindus want a temple to be built at the site, while Muslims want a new mosque.

Hindus claim the mosque was the birthplace of one of their most revered deities,

Lord Ram, and that it was built after the destruction of a Hindu temple

by a Muslim invader in the 16th Century 

In 2011 after setting aside a lower court's order which in a 8,500-page judgement

said that two-thirds of the disputed site should be allocated to Hindu groups

with the remainder going to Muslims.  :-\

give it to Budha

The two Hindu judges on the three-judge panel

said that the building constructed by the founder of the Mughal dynasty in India,

Babur, was not a mosque because it was built "against the tenets of Islam"

on the site of a demolished Hindu temple 

The Muslim judge on the panel said it was built on rubble !  ;D

Kwami and SCA however claim that :

Babur was their favourite Mughal barbarian ! 8)

Snoopster gave a thumbs up !

I think i will go over there and solve that problem.