Quote:But the funniest thing is the way "traditional masculinity" is actually the gayest thing around. From buff sports dudes showering together, to male heroes homoerotically penetrating one another with guns and swords, to the muscular action heroes of the 1970s and 80s (Rambo, Rocky, Arnie etc; all an unconscious response to women's and civil rights) who walked about topless like giant walking cavemen penises, complete with ejaculatory explosions, nothing is more gay than traditional masculinity. This is because masculinity is always defining itself in opposition to perceived notions of femininity (a femininity which it believes to be weak and insecure), an opposition which masks its own deep insecurities.
all dat looks like a christian european derivation to me..religious, sectarian nonsense imposed on human sexuality to control humanity, that has resulted in all manner of unintended consequences perhaps
all that is also psy op..psychological operation...perpetrated on the people using archetypes and images, and symbols to tweak and condition minds by the media..movies, plays, general reportage of 'news' in the society..or whatever official purpose going
there are original sources before europe, before christianity that dealt with like issues not in this way. europe arose and super imposed its nonsense.
yet homosexuality current is not only a compendium of unintended and intended consequences from past religious direction..but a political imposition by current powers to render society degraded all the better to control it at a time of fundamental social crisis for them..and us to..for society as a whole
as I argued there is a gay program afoot the intention of which is not good for the 99% of society.
THAT IS THE POINT..NOT THE EVOLUTION OF AND NATURE OF GAY ETC ETC.
left alone gays worked out their own surival like all social groups. did and does. the rest of society never stopped that..so that there are gay city centres and locations of congregation all over the place..all over the world.
I dont have to have an opinion about that. thats life the way it goes. I see it and leave it for it is none of my business as such. where it is my business is the discrimination gays faced. I say fine the goverments have laws on books to deal with that ,they should enforce them. but the governments did not do that. the police for one hated gays and did nothing to protect them. o
elite society did not care about gays and for generations they were harassed, beaten, discriminated against, portrayed like the devil in the media like devils, rats etc.
now we have a 100% change..not the result of any massive upsurge of gays fighting for civil rights but by official policy change with little promoting from social opposition to the treatment of gays..why ::confused::
there is an official program to use gays in north america and in the world for some purpose that is not in the best interest of society as a whole. that clearly is the case..and that is what I argue against
