Can Vlad Putin be Trusted....?

https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2017/02...-3-months/


its hard to criticize Vlad Putin but things appear at times that simply make no sense if Vlad Putin is really  and truly a Russian nationalist, rather than some crazy, lusting, hard wired  america/western wannabe.

just 2 point here so far:
why are Russian Diplomats dying like flies allover the world and no Russian response, even explanation and commentary on it by the Russians ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::

and look at the quality of the diplomats who have died..some  of the best more  progressive brains in the world.

if Russian  diplomats are being assassinated who they hell is doing it and why ::confused:: ::confused::

and why the phuck dont the Russians  say something tot he world...any dam thing once its the truth... to clarify the issue ::confused:: ::confused::

next one for today:  why in the hell did Putin invite the americans to the Syrian peace talks in Astana. Kharzakstan..after Syria, Iran and China, with Russia had agreed keep them out, that they had caused all the trouble and that their involvement would be counter productive  ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::

I don understand Putin at all...why do these gaffes of his relative to the west, keep popping up ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::

http://www.globalresearch.ca/four-dead-r...hs/5576055

Four Dead Russian Diplomats in Three Months

http://allnewspipeline.com/Moving_Us_Onw...ds_WW3.php

Quote:Are Russian Diplomats Being Assassinated? Globalists Continue March Towards World War 3 As Russian Ambassador To The UN Mysteriously Dies In New York

this situation has me so angry it isnt funny.

why isnt Putin protecting his people..how many deaths will it take for him to beef up their security, change all the working patterns that exposes his people to danger, to reflect maximum effort to have his people protected at all times, observed at all times.....

how the f-word can so many people die and no observable protective and/or retaliatory response ::confused::  and so they will continue to die.... ::confused:: ::confused::
::confused:: ::confused::

someone is trying to abort Russian effort in the world..and to start a world war.  and no doubt it must be the zionists for nothing of this sort happens in the world unless they are behind it.
for those at the top..Putin for sure..this can be no mystery at all.  they know who is doing it if these are assassinations.  they must know, whatever it is causing these deaths.  it is incumbent on them to tell the world what is going on.

at times it seems that Putin is playing a stinking, rotten, traitorous game with the west, that he is in their corner and would love nothing better than to have Russia in a western incestuous relationship, despite all that he has done to the contrary.

for the moment I give him the benefit of doubt and await clarification on this issue.  but
Putin should recognize and accept that such clarification is urgent for the world and that he gives it up as soon as possible

http://thesaker.is/are-russian-diplomats...assinated/

Quote:SAKER MESSAGE:
WordPress trainers needed!
A former (?) Mossad officer predicts that Trump will be impeached on grounds of treason
WordPress trainers needed!
A former (?) Mossad officer predicts that Trump will be impeached on grounds of treason
Are Russian diplomats being assassinated? (UPDATED)
3642 ViewsFebruary 21, 2017 63 Comments
Since the death of Vitaly Churkin I see more and more speculations that Russian diplomats are being killed (example here and here)  This is exceedingly unlikely and I consider these speculations to be based on ignorance and a form of “clickbaiting”.  Here is why:

So four senior Russian diplomats have died in one month.  Considering how many diplomats Russia has worldwide, this hardly a tsunami.
They died in Ankara (murder), Athens (natural causes), New Delhi (disease) and New York (heart attack).  There is no pattern, no modus operandi, no common link between these men and their deaths.
During the Cold War the US and Soviets had an understanding that they would not attack each other’s personnel simply because any such attack would trigger an immediate retaliation which both sides wanted to avoid.  There is absolutely nothing suggesting that this has changed.
Killing diplomats is useless.  They don’t really take decisions but their symbolic value is immense.  Thus the benefit for murdering them is zero and the cost potentially a nuclear war.
Russia is not the Palestinian Authority which had to ask for a French expertise to establish the real cause of death of Yassir Arafat.  If anybody hard murdered Russian diplomats the Russians would inevitably find out who did it and why and the retaliation would be terrible (all, repeat, all the Takfiri Chechen leaders have by now been killed by the Russians, as have been the units who killed the Russian pilot in Syria as have been the key Takfiri leaders in Aleppo).
Coincidences do happen and not everything is the result of a conspiracy.  In this case, there is exactly zero evidence of a plot by anybody to murder Russian diplomats and spreading rumors about that is unhelpful and distracting from the important issues.

The Saker

Quote:The Saker

UPDATE: okay, I am not coming across, so let me try something different: call two authorities to my rescue.  First, Carl Sagan who used to say that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence“.  In this case, the claim is absolutely extraordinary: the murder of a senior diplomat is basically an act of war.  As for the evidence, at this time of writing it is exactly ZERO.  Nothing.  Ziltch.  Nihil.  My next expert authority is William of Occam who wrote “Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem” which meaning can be roughly rendered as “the simplest explanation is the best”.  For example, while it is definitely *possible* that Russian diplomats have been murdered, it is far more likely that they simply died.  Of course, I cannot prove a negative.  But at this point in time I repeat that this line of speculation is based on absolutely nothing, that there is no evidence at all while the the claim is truly extraordinary.  To simple speculate on the basis of a statistically irrelevant sample and arrive far reaching hypotheses is simply not “analysis”.  At best, this is idle gossip.  Frankly, I am kind of shocked and even disappointed that so many seem to miss the total lack of evidentiary support, nevermind any “proof”, for this hypothesis.

That was the Saker..a powerful Russian voice in Blog sphere currently.
that is his opinion but look at the commentary below...almost 100% opposed to the Saker


eg:  Franz on February 22, 2017  ·  at 12:05 am UTC
The agreement that prevented petty, tit-for-tat murders during the Cold War is as defunct as the one between Crimea and The Ukraine.
The USA has been taken over by the neocons in the basement. They have no rules as their willingness to raze what is left of responsible governance in the USA shows.
I see no reason why their scorched earth policy does not apply to their entire sphere of influence.

Moreoeover, how many US Ambassadors have died at their posts in the same, or similar period of time?

that's right!  no one at all I have encountered thinks that the deaths of 4 top Russian diplomats in a very short space of time is coincidental.  how in the hell can they be..what are the statistical chances of that happening ::confused::

the only people I see who appear to think that it is coincidence are the Saker and Vlad Putin apparently

as far as I have been able to determine such a thing had never happened before in their history of diplomacy.

it is never happened, nada. nothing like it has ever happened..at all period never. 

I would bet good money that the deaths of Russian diplomats, are the results of an american/israeli program of assassination pure and simple. 

the people behind it are the Zios/Neo Con liberals who are determined to confront Russian/China in global war

here is a second comment by Franz

Quote:Franz on February 22, 2017  ·  at 12:35 am UTC
And though you say that “killing diplomats is useless”, I respectfully disagree. Diplomats are born, not made, as the sorry state of Diplomacy in the world, and especially in the Anglo-Zionist Empire amply demonstrates. The schools may still functioning but the product is highly questionable. If, until recently, the USSD used the travelogue of the survivor of the French Terror, the charmant Marquis de Custine as a serious text, I rest my case.
Gone are the days when the Ambassador to the Russian court, from Austria I believe, could say when asked to gather intelligence for his state: “I am not a spy”.
No. Churkin certainly, and I suspect the others are trained, seasoned, talented, born diplomats and therefore they were indispensible.

These, now unquestionably dead, diplomats were unarguably key figures in: Greece, a state in turmoil; Turkey, the same, only more so; The UN, a cesspool with the execrable Bolton, succeeded by the disgusting Powers and now this deplorable creature Haley; and so on.

Reply