well I have to know wat YOU mean. you could have been calling one the other at your convenience for whatever purpose. which is why I answered as I did.
now I know wat you mean.
inbreeding is a term of modern science that is unknown how it really fits the process it purports to describe. they do not know all that's involved.
here is sheldrake..a biologist of the first order on the meaning of genes, dna etc. they are proteins and not really responsible for anything but the job they are coded to do.
and there is no longer any reductionist base for anything once thought to be fundamental. atoms are just a point into which you can go no one knows how far, into the nucleus of an atom..if there is an end to it. but an atom is so small you cant see it. yet it is not a fundamental basis
biology seems long past those links ketchim posted up.
now I know wat you mean.
inbreeding is a term of modern science that is unknown how it really fits the process it purports to describe. they do not know all that's involved.
here is sheldrake..a biologist of the first order on the meaning of genes, dna etc. they are proteins and not really responsible for anything but the job they are coded to do.
and there is no longer any reductionist base for anything once thought to be fundamental. atoms are just a point into which you can go no one knows how far, into the nucleus of an atom..if there is an end to it. but an atom is so small you cant see it. yet it is not a fundamental basis
biology seems long past those links ketchim posted up.
