Just hours after it was reported that Kieron Pollard was denied a No Objection Certificate (NOC) as the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) chose to impose a charge for releasing its players to overseas T20 leagues, WICB CEO stated on Twitter that that allrounder has been granted the NOC to participate in South Africa's T20 bash.
deh see the negative reaction building up and they scram. they must have thought they had this one in the bag, that they wud get all the support they needed.
deh must have been planning a salary raise fuh themselves and needed the cash to cover up the hole they wud create elsewhere by taking the players money
In my view this is less to do with any specific player but the principle of a fee for a NOC and, for me, I have a problem with that for uncontracted players.
How is this fund weighted for reinvestment, given say Guyanans are not contributing diddly-squat along with a few others?
Would clubs agree to pay the % or would the player have to reduce his salary?
Being specific, if any player was contracted they should request an amount equivalent to the time they are not available for the Windies pro rata.
[quote author=Mail link=topic=106951.msg719668#msg719668 date=1478917412]
Would clubs agree to pay the % or would the player have to reduce his salary?
[/quote]
The Foreign league pays : Negotiated Salary to the player + 20% of that to the Board
Board then splits it up 3 ways
Trini Board would get, Trini U19 squad and Trini local club, say in Preysal.
5. The release fees form part of an overall contribution to the continued development of and are split between WICB, the Territorial Board and the club within the territory with which the player is registered
[/quote]