[quote author=ketchim link=topic=106746.msg717836#msg717836 date=1477435334]
Jesus Mary and Joseph !
Oppo Bats making almost Triple, Double and Single Tons
ON a Batting Strip : and YOU bigging up 41 as "in form" ???
C'mon Maps, show some Class .....sheeesssshhh :-[
[/quote]
look man..your comprehension seems sort or weary. you do not understand what I have been saying ... and I don't know wat the hell you mean but I will try to sort it out. are you very tired ::confused:: ::confused::
hope is not established and is still to find his way. the Pak batsmen are better, mostly established. and no west indian batsman score a ton but Bravo. we now have Blackwoods 95 and Paints 67 in addition.
Hopes 41 compares well to Leons 47, and anything Samules has done, Chase etc.
and we are dealing with this series here right now..not any future I can see.
I cant see then wat you are talking about ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
we do not have a single batsman who can score a triple century in a test match at the moment..not one..even if the pitch is concrete.
so wat do you mean..41 as compared to triples ::confused::
when I select Hope all is in balance. his selection on what he has done is relevant..forget the Paks and their triples and doubles. that is not in our game at the moment
Jesus Mary and Joseph !
Oppo Bats making almost Triple, Double and Single Tons
ON a Batting Strip : and YOU bigging up 41 as "in form" ???
C'mon Maps, show some Class .....sheeesssshhh :-[
[/quote]
look man..your comprehension seems sort or weary. you do not understand what I have been saying ... and I don't know wat the hell you mean but I will try to sort it out. are you very tired ::confused:: ::confused::
hope is not established and is still to find his way. the Pak batsmen are better, mostly established. and no west indian batsman score a ton but Bravo. we now have Blackwoods 95 and Paints 67 in addition.
Hopes 41 compares well to Leons 47, and anything Samules has done, Chase etc.
and we are dealing with this series here right now..not any future I can see.
I cant see then wat you are talking about ::confused:: ::confused:: ::confused::
we do not have a single batsman who can score a triple century in a test match at the moment..not one..even if the pitch is concrete.
so wat do you mean..41 as compared to triples ::confused::
when I select Hope all is in balance. his selection on what he has done is relevant..forget the Paks and their triples and doubles. that is not in our game at the moment
