Marine Le Pen’s Anti-Islam Message Gains Influence in France

Chin · 11-17-2015, 11:22 PM · 4 people reading this discussion

#1
Marine Le Pen’s Anti-Islam Message Gains Influence in France
By ADAM NOSSITERNOV. 17, 2015

PARIS — Well before the attacks that killed 129 people in Paris on Friday, Marine Le Pen, the president of the far-right National Front party, was parlaying fear of Islam, migrants and open borders into political support. Now, with France angry and in mourning, she is seizing the opportunity to expand her appeal and show her clout, underscoring how far-right messages are resonating across Europe.

“France and the French are no longer safe,” Ms. Le Pen said in a speech the day after the attacks, demanding a crackdown on Islamists in the country.

Analysts said Ms. Le Pen’s already favorable prospects in regional elections in three weeks have most likely been given a lift, strengthening her position as a possible presidential candidate in 2017. She has also succeeded in pulling the political center of gravity in France to the right, forcing the main center-right party to adopt a stronger anti-immigration stance and taking positions in the wake of Friday’s attacks that were subsequently adopted by President François Hollande, a Socialist.

After Ms. Le Pen’s speech on Saturday, two stars in the National Front — her vice president and close adviser, Florian Philippot, and her niece Marion Maréchal-Le Pen — renewed the offensive, bolstered by the discovery of a Syrian passport near the remains of one of the suicide bombers at the national soccer stadium.

“It really poses the question that we have been asking, that they will infiltrate the migratory flux that is arriving in Europe,” Mr. Philippot said Monday on a television news program.

“It is irresponsible to continue this welcoming of migrants,” he said. “And this is a question that will be asked increasingly in coming weeks.”

On Tuesday, Ms. Maréchal-Le Pen, a 25-year-old telegenic parliamentary deputy who stands a good chance of being elected president of the Provence-Alps-Côte d’Azur region in the next elections, lashed out on television at immigration in the wake of the attacks. “Today, we can see that immigration has become favorable terrain for the development of Islamism,” she said.

Analysts said this repeated connection — immigration equals Islamism and terrorism — is playing powerfully in the minds of voters.

“Very probably, yes, she will profit from this,” said Sylvain Crépon, a National Front expert at the university in Tours, in central France. He recalled that after train attacks in 1995, Jean-Marie Le Pen, the National Front leader and Ms. Le Pen’s father, was given a sharp electoral boost after making a link between immigration and security.

“It is certain that the discourse of Marine Le Pen, which makes the same link, stands a good chance of becoming perfectly resonant in the population,” Mr. Crépon said. “All the more so because she has said that among the immigrants there would be terrorists. One could predict that this will prove profitable to the Front.”

Other experts on the Front agreed that the party would benefit. “It certainly will fuel the National Front,” said Nonna Mayer of the CNRS research institute.

“We have images of refugees every day, and now, terrorism,” Ms. Mayer said. “The National Front has been saying, ‘We have been warning you for the last 10 years.’ At first sight it will help their dynamic, which is already excellent.”

Across Europe, right-wing and far-right parties have also been capitalizing on the attacks.

In Germany, the anti-immigrant Pegida group organized a march of 10,000 in Dresden on Monday evening, and one of the organizers quoted Ms. Le Pen at length. In Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orban told Parliament on Monday that “terrorists have exploited mass migration.” In Poland, a minister in the new conservative government published an article on a right-wing website suggesting that, given the events in Paris, Poland might have to reconsider plans to accept nearly 7,000 migrants.

Ms. Le Pen’s first reaction on Saturday suggested that the disaster she had long predicted had finally arrived. She then demanded a crackdown on Islamists in France, which would go on to be taken up, down to the details, by the country’s Socialist government over the next few days.

Farhad Khosrokhavar of the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales said he expected a strong political reaction against Muslims in France in coming months.

“There is likely to be more of a shift to the extreme right, which will become stronger in the months to come,” he said.

Analysts here have long expressed admiration for Ms. Le Pen’s political skills, even as they have suggested that her exclusionary message is harmful to France. She has handled the aftermath of Friday’s attacks with particular deftness, several suggested.

First, the proposals that she made Saturday, to “expel foreigners who preach hatred on our soil” and to strip binational Islamists of citizenship, were immediately endorsed, in one form or another, by France’s Socialist prime minister, Manuel Valls, and by Mr. Hollande, who suggested the measure should be applied to those convicted of terrorism even if they were born French citizens.

The newspaper Le Monde said Mr. Hollande had made a “180-degree turnaround” on this point.

And then, unlike after the attacks on the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in January, Ms. Le Pen was careful to moderate her tone somewhat, associating herself with the mood of national unity and grief, and lightening her criticism of the government.

“She made a faux pas after Charlie Hebdo, refusing to associate herself with national unity,” Mr. Crépon said. “This time, she didn’t make the same mistake. She has tried, in spite of everything, to be part of this moment of national unity.”

#2
These kind of racist messages are just a strategy to put fear on society and try to earn some votes, and I'm really sick of this woman, I feel like she's way too radical and racist, and the kind of statements that she is always making are the kind of things that create hate between different members of a society.

#3
It's easy to see why such sentiments are widely held by many Europeans, not just in France. Many muslims who have entered Europe from Asia and Africa have been quick to take advantage of the welfare system and job opportunities in the EU, but at the same time refused to integrate. You only need to go to a parents evening at the local primary school in order to see how much they fail to be part of the wider community. You'll find Hindus, and Christians, but no muslim parents at such events. On the street many of the women hide their face behind their burkas. Their imams hardly ever condemn such terrorist attacks in Europe. So the non-muslim population is wary of muslims. Many of the identified European muslims who joined ISIL were described by their neighbours as nice guys who went about their business without causing any problems. This has added to the fear that even the nice muslims might not be so nice in reality. And this is driving the fear of muslims living in one's neighbourhood. 

#4
They do not realize the crippling economic impact of their actions on the muslim community worldwide. Opportunities for education and jobs will be harder to come by. And they will under perform as a consequence.
Some of the apologists and sympathizers swear by these terrorists, however if his own brother doesn't know him, then how do they expect anyone else to know him? Ho do one explain their relationship? And then why didn't the red-flag go up? Complicity? Anyways, one down, one to go.

#5
Chin, are you saying the US, Russian and French are targeting innocent people? I would think that these countries have no interest in killing innocent civilians.

Right about now you have ISIS in all of those countries you mentioned. The bombings are targeting ISIS strongholds. What do you expect? What do you want them to do? Allow this crazy group to spread like the cancer that it is? 

#6
Again, lets look at the situation. ISIS attacked Paris. ISIS bombed the Russian plane. ISIS is attacking American interests. Who would you go after?

No one knows who really created ISIS. There are many plausible reasons given for the formation. That said, it is time to disband them. They are not good for civil society.

#7
And your explanation is another. Know thyself, man.

Right now Santoro claimed that Hillary and Obama created ISIS. The fact of the matter is ISIS is a terrorist organization...and it needs to be wiped off the surface of the earth. Put these folks out of their misery, so that they don't have to make the world miserable.
 

#8
ISIS is CIA....you will never get rid of them.


once corruption is alive..so will all these "groups"

#9
i disagree CHin.


it is not because anyone went there to meddle in middle east affairs.


it is all in the favour of the NWO...its higher than the govnt.

#10
no i always knew there was an NWO at work...prior to Bond.


you need to get caught up.

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)