chris ram tries to bribe the magistrate

Ram rebuked for contacting Magistrate
June 23, 2015 By GuyanaTimes
Magistrate Charlyn Artiga
Magistrate Charlyn Artiga
Ram vs Jagdeo court case

… escapes censure after apologising
Magistrate Charlyn Artiga on Monday rebuked Attorney-at-Law Christopher Ram for making contact with her via telephone in relation to the issues arising from the private politically motivated criminal charge he made against former President Bharrat Jagdeo for remarks made at Babu Jaan, Port Mourant earlier this year.
One respected Attorney told Guyana Times that Ram was lucky to escape with just a warning for initiating an ex-parte communication with the Magistrate.
  The prohibition against ex-parte communications with the court is designed to protect the opposing party’s right to a fair hearing and, ultimately, the impartiality and integrity of the courts.
    Communications are commonly understood to be ex-parte if made by one party outside the record without giving the other party notice or an opportunity to respond.
    Besides in-person contact, the rule covers communication by telephone, letter, e-mail and any other modes.
The case was called again at the Whim Magistrate’s Court on Monday, but was adjourned until July 13 owing to Jagdeo’s ill health.
Jagdeo was represented by Attorneys-at-Law Mursaline Bacchus, Adrian Anamayah and Perry Gossai who submitted a medical report explaining his absence.
The medical report was accepted and the presiding Magistrate adjourned the matter until July 13.
Bacchus explained to the court that a letter was submitted a few days back stating that Jagdeo was unwell.
Further, the Attorneys made an application for statements and a transcript from the recording to be made available.
Apology
Magistrate Artiga made it clear that she would not permit anyone (Complainant or Defendant) to contact her personally on matters regarding the case.
She made this statement after Ram had sought to contact her via the telephone regarding issues he had.
She said any contact should be made through the court, either through the clerk or the office and both parties should be present.
Ram, through his lawyer, Charrandass Persaud, apologised to the Magistrate for making contact with her, the apology was accepted.
Monday’s hearing was relatively quiet with no protesters.
The private politically motivated charge was filed under Section 139 D1A of the Representation of the People Act by Ram regarding remarks made by Jagdeo on March 8 at Babu Jaan, Port Mourant.
Ram contended that the statements made can result in racial or ethnic hatred among the people.
Under the said act, if found guilty, a person can face a fine of $100,000 together with two years’ imprisonment.
Jagdeo had made his first appearance in the case on May 25 amid protesting supporters who said that the charge was politically motivated.
No evidence
During the first hearing, Senior Counsel Bernard De Santos had argued that the charge filed showed no evidence that an offence was committed.
“The charge before the court does not disclose any offence leading to the law, so we want it quashed. We want it thrown out; that’s essentially what we are aiming for…you cannot charge someone if there is no offence.”
De Santos said after examining the allegation and the section of the law under which the charge has been laid, in his view, it was frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court in which it has been filed.
Further, he pointed out that it was a gross misinterpretation and colossal misuse and abuse of Section 139D of the Representation of the People Act, Chap1:02.
The Senior Counsel noted that while he would not speculate in relation to the motive which inspired the institution of the charge, he will, however, state that “it constitutes an abridgement of the constitutional right and freedom of my client to speak and express himself freely”.
De Santos further noted that the unprecedented use of a criminal charge to muzzle speakers at public political events was an assault on the democratic right of political leaders to speak freely on matters of national interest as well as a violation of the democratic right of the citizenry to receive such information.
He said that the case was nothing more than political sensationalisation and mischief.
Share Button
TwitterFacebookGoogle PlusPinterestLinkedinTumblrStumbleUponDiggRedditBeboDelicious
Related
CJ quashes Magistrate’s decision
In "TOP STORIES"
Kaieteur News attacks integrity, independence of judiciary
In "NEWS"
Jagdeo on temporary overseas travel ban
In "TOP STORIES"

Wow

Look how Jagdeo think he can CIRCUMVENT the Judicial system.

someone remind him and his lawyer Snoopster : they are NOT in power !  ::LOL::

Perry Goosai is Snoopster !

[color=rgb(20, 24, 35)][size=1px]CHRIS RAm used to beat up ena, and pimp his daughters ... what else is this bastard good for![/size][/color]

chris ram used to beat up his wife ena and pimp out his daughters... what else this is bastard good for

[quote author=-katti batti link=topic=98367.msg643036#msg643036 date=1435095222]
CHRIS RAm used to beat up ena, and pimp his daughters ... what else is this bastard good for!
[/quote]

Exactly ! de kunnumunu think the Judge would listen and he gonna try a Bribe  >


Memo : PPP is NO longer in power and Corruption of the Judicial system ;

WILL be Stamped out for once and for all !

this bai ketchim na gone back to Guyana in 40 years...
he love to fly off his mouth...

I know how dem Operate .

Back in the 70s I bribed to get off a Car accident.

Case Jacket disappeared for a few dollars ...

Prevalent til today !

My Car Licence was delivered to my door : by a Police Officer.

I never sat any test and nevah drive b4.

Again for a few dollars more ~


Gyallo , u too small to know the Shenanigans and Corruption :

that is FIRMLY embedded in Guyana 

[size=15px][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]Here’s a breakdown of some of Trudeau’s promises:[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– End “political harassment” of charities and make the Canada Revenue Agency more open: The Liberals would end “political harassment of charities” and clarify rules to allow charities to develop and advocate for public policy. They would also change the way the Canada Revenue Agency communicates with Canadians, by proactively contacting Canadians when they are entitled to but are not receiving tax benefits.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Reform access-to-information laws: The Liberals promised to make to all government data open by default in machine-readable, digital formats, to scrap access to information fees beyond the initial $5 charge, to give written explanations within 30 days when information cannot be disclosed, empower the Information Commissioner — the access-to-information watchdog — with the ability to order disclosures, review the Access to Information Act through Parliament every five years and, as HuffPost first reported, expand the access laws to cover the prime minister’s and ministers’ offices, as well as administrative institutions that support Parliament and the courts. The Liberal plan would also make it easier for Canadians to get access to personal information the government has about them.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Money-back guarantee for federal public services: The Liberals would create performance standards for services to reduce waiting times, streamline applications and give money-back guarantees in areas such as employment insurance processing, veterans’ services, immigration processing, Canada Pension Plan and EI appeals at the Social Security Tribunal.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Stop the plan to end door-to-door mail delivery: The Liberals say they will begin a new review of Canada Post to ensure that the Crown corporation fulfills its mandate and is not charging more for reduced services to Canadians in urban, suburban and rural areas.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Bring more transparency to Parliament: The Liberals would ensure quarterly and detailed expense reports by MPs, make the Board of Internal Economy — the all-party committee that administers the Commons — open by default, ask the auditor general to do mandatory performance audits of the House and Senate.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– More free votes: Liberal caucus members in a Trudeau government would be required to vote with the cabinet only on measures that implement the Liberals’ electoral platform; confidence matters such as the speech from the throne and budget bills; and matters related to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms — this would include supporting a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Enable better oversight of government: The Liberals would change the way the government’s books are reported to Parliament so MPs can track the money more easily. They would provide a cost analysis for each government bill. They would strengthen the role of parliamentary committee chairs by electing them by secret ballot, and give committees more resources to acquire independent analysis of proposed legislation. They promised to make the parliamentary budget officer more independent and ensure that it and other government watchdog are fully funded. The Liberals would also create an all-party national security oversight committee to monitor and oversee the operations of every government department with national security responsibilities. This was one of the major criticisms of C-51.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– End “abuse” of prorogation and omnibus bills: Trudeau promised that he will not use prorogation to “avoid difficult political circumstances.” Harper used prorogation to avoid a confidence vote in 2008 that would have brought down his government. The Liberals also pledged not use omnibus bills to reduce scrutiny of new policies.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Senate reform: The Liberals would create a non-partisan, merit-based, broad process to advise the prime minister on Senate appointments and make the chamber more transparent in ways the auditor general recently suggested.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Reform Supreme Court appointments: The Liberals would ensure that all Supreme Court justices are functionally bilingual and create a more representative and transparent process to advise on appointments to the country’s top court.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Government appointments: Trudeau pledged to have an equal number of women and men in his cabinet and to adopt an appointment process that would ensure gender parity and more representation from indigenous peoples and minority groups.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Involve Canadians in policy-making: The Liberals would use technology to engage more Canadians in the development and evaluation of public policy. Trudeau would also create a Prime Minister’s Youth Advisory Council to get input from 16- to 24-year-olds.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Make it easier to vote: The Liberals say they will work with the provinces to register high school students so Elections Canada can stay in touch with them. They would also support Elections Canada proactively registering Canadians from groups with historically lower voter turnout, such as students. They would also repeal certain aspects of the Fair Elections Act, scrap the Citizen Voting Act, and allow voter identification cards to be used as an acceptable form of identification. The Liberals would also increase penalties for violation of election laws.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Strengthen Elections Canada: The Liberals would provide more resources to the election agency so it can investigate voter fraud, voter suppression and illegal financing.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Ban partisan government ads: The Liberals would appoint an advertising commissioner to oversee government advertising and ensure they are non-partisan.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Crack down on pre-writ party spending: The Liberals say they would place limits on party spending between elections.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Independent party leaders’ debates: The Liberals said they would create an independent commission to organize leaders’ debates during election campaigns, so that a prime minister cannot skip out on televised debates as Harper has chosen to do this year.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Allow government scientists to speak: The Liberals say they would unmuzzle scientists and allow them to speak freely about their work. They would also create a chief science officer to ensure that government science is available to the public and that scientific analyses are considered in government decisions.[/color][/size]
[/size][size=15px][/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]– Bring back the long-form census: The Liberals say they would make Statistics Canada fully independent and expand its data collection to include more detailed labour market information, child development data and information on “natural capital.” They would immediately restore the mandatory long-form census.[/color][/size]