As the Ebola epidemic rages on, health officials have gone into the trenches around the globe, putting their lives at risk to save those of others afflicted by the devastating virus.
Yes, but… what do our beloved celebrities think of it all?
As happens with nearly ever big-news crisis, stars have been inserting themselves into the ongoing conversation about the disease — and nabbing ample news headlines in the process.
Is it ridiculous to focus on celebrities when “real†people are combating the disease on the ground in tangible, meaningful ways? Is it distressing that people pay more attention to the young studs of One Direction than the UN chief talking about efforts to eradicate the virus? Yes and hell yes. But we can’t ignore how much sway celebs hold with the masses — meaning their participation, ill or good, does have an impact on awareness and dialogue.
Celebrities also serve as a high-profile microcosm of base human nature, their responses illuminating an inclination toward responses both commendable (altruism, compassion) and detestable (jingoism, selfishness, hysteria).
Yes, but… what do our beloved celebrities think of it all?
As happens with nearly ever big-news crisis, stars have been inserting themselves into the ongoing conversation about the disease — and nabbing ample news headlines in the process.
Is it ridiculous to focus on celebrities when “real†people are combating the disease on the ground in tangible, meaningful ways? Is it distressing that people pay more attention to the young studs of One Direction than the UN chief talking about efforts to eradicate the virus? Yes and hell yes. But we can’t ignore how much sway celebs hold with the masses — meaning their participation, ill or good, does have an impact on awareness and dialogue.
Celebrities also serve as a high-profile microcosm of base human nature, their responses illuminating an inclination toward responses both commendable (altruism, compassion) and detestable (jingoism, selfishness, hysteria).