[quote author=pattycake link=topic=93933.msg599541#msg599541 date=1416006336] Let's go behind the allegory.
According to the old testament, god was all anger and out for revenge on the idol worshipers. Then Moses came along and led the slaves out of Sumer to the isle Patmos, which is right across the shore of Asia Minor, which is the historical birthplace of the non black races and where the lighter ethnic groups were grafted out the black slaves through selective breeding, a movement orchestrated and led by Moses. Patmos is only a short boat ride from Europe, and the lighter peoples were dispersed from the island to Europe and other areas in Asia. Such as in the Rebekah verses: "Where shall I live?" Okay, the lighter peoples were sent from Patmos to live in other areas.
Okay, and then Jesus arrives with a new testament where god is now loving, forgiving, and all about loving thy neighbor. Why ever wasn't he a lover of thy neighbor to begin with?
Because all of the people were black and living in misery to the cruel subjugation of other blacks. The god in the old testament were men, okay, and Jesus is allegory for white people. And now that the new people are here the same sins can be forgiven and the people can move on and evolve on. Apparently, what the allegories are indirectly saying is that blacks were oppressed before there was any such as white people, their misery led to the creation of white people, and the real name of Moses of Yakub.
[/quote]load of shit . Show me references or quote old testament passages. . This is NOI bullshit
[quote author=ramesh link=topic=93933.msg599544#msg599544 date=1416006786]
load of s*** . Show me references or quote old testament passages. . This is NOI bulls***
[/quote]
Okay,
So you can accept the Ham shit, but not Yakub?
A white boy got cursed and turned black because he saw his drunk father's wee wee? And the creation and suffering of black people started from there? You can believe that but not Yakub?
First off, it's a scientific fact that all of the lighter ethnic groups derived from the black African. In fact, white people develop dark brown spots of melanin on their skin. Especially when they grow older. So how do you figure that the history of Yakub is bullshit?
I'll tell you why....
You can't accept it because you want to point your finger at the white man.
You can't accept the fact that blacks were oppressed before there was any such thing as white people.
And whereas blacks who live in sleep want to say that their problems didn't begin until the white man came along, the truth is that we wouldn't be where are now if it weren't for white people. Just take a look at Africa today, how black Africans are subjugating themselves and still carrying on chattel slavery.
A white boy got cursed and turned black because he saw his drunk father's wee wee? And the creation and suffering of black people started from there? You can believe that but not Yakub?
First off, it's a scientific fact that all of the lighter ethnic groups derived from the black African. In fact, white people develop dark brown spots of melanin on their skin. Especially when they grow older. So how do you figure that the history of Yakub is bulls***?
I'll tell you why....
You can't accept it because you want to point your finger at the white man.
You can't accept the fact that blacks were oppressed before there was any such thing as white people.
And whereas blacks who live in sleep want to say that their problems didn't begin until the white man came along, the truth is that we wouldn't be where are now if it weren't for white people. Just take a look at Africa today, how black Africans are subjugating themselves and still carrying on chattel slavery.
[/quote] Are you daft ? Where did I say that I accepted Ham .
I stated that the story of Ham is what is used by the whiteman to Justify slavery . They interpreted the ham story to make Ham black
[quote author=ramesh link=topic=93933.msg599551#msg599551 date=1416009353]
Are you daft ? Where did I say that I accepted Ham .
I stated that the story of Ham is what is used by the whiteman to Justify slavery . They interpreted the ham story to make Ham black
[/quote]
Slavery was an institution with blacks before there was any such thing as white people, and it's still an institution in black Africa now. Now how do you justify that?
According to the old testament, Moses was a big time prince who turned and defected against his thrown, which is the western interpretation of Yakub who was a member of the ruling class in Sumer, who defected on the Sumerian government and lead the majority of the people out thru trickery. Do you really think that the story of Moses is just something cooked up in the imagination?
Think again. It's a spin on a historical event.
In fact, an old Jewish man told me a long time ago that Jesus was black, and little did I realize that he was talking about Yakub. Yakub is the only black man in history who fits the religious figure of Jesus, Muhammad, Krishna, etc...., in it's claim of a man who came and changed the world.
Yakub is the only man who historically fits that description.
[quote author=pattycake link=topic=93933.msg599554#msg599554 date=1416010850]
According to the old testament, Moses was a big time prince who turned and defected against his thrown, which is the western interpretation of Yakub who was a member of the ruling class in Sumer, who defected on the Sumerian government and lead the majority of the people out thru trickery. Do you really think that the story of Moses is just something cooked up in the imagination?
Think again. It's a spin on a historical event.
In fact, an old Jewish man told me a long time ago that Jesus was black, and little did I realize that he was talking about Yakub. Yakub is the only black man in history who fits the religious figure of Jesus, Muhammad, Krishna, etc...., in it's claim of a man who came and changed the world.
Yakub is the only man who historically fits that description.
[/quote]Slavery was an institution before the white man? you making this shit up?
[quote author=ramesh link=topic=93933.msg599555#msg599555 date=1416012567]
Slavery was an institution before the white man? you making this s*** up?
[/quote]
I don't understand why the government in India and other countries with this problem don't educate the poor about birth control. Condoms would eliminate this problem. I know these dwellings barely have any electricity and getting information to them is difficult but how long does it take for an official to address a million people about how to use a condom. Why did these women want to be voluntarily sterilized ? I read briefly about it and I thought it was government ordered. As if sterilizing 10 women in India will make a lick of difference.
[quote author=wulfman link=topic=93933.msg599563#msg599563 date=1416019161]
I don't understand why the government in India and other countries with this problem don't educate the poor about birth control. Condoms would eliminate this problem. I know these dwellings barely have any electricity and getting information to them is difficult but how long does it take for an official to address a million people about how to use a condom. Why did these women want to be voluntarily sterilized ? I read briefly about it and I thought it was government ordered. As if sterilizing 10 women in India will make a lick of difference.
[/quote]
Well they're thinking more of money and sex than anything. Which are the two rulers of human life.
So you got people who don't want to use condoms and think that having a baby is what makes you a woman.