there it is right there..the first connection with what is undoubtedly the truth..the poisoning of Africa.
and all ah allyuh know or suspect that that is the case whether you care or not.
well we will soon have the proof. you know they never sleep on theses things
It Begins...
De west spreading ebola. De west spread aids. LOL
Dem africans need to get dem house in order. Dem buying arms all over de place and killing one another so de west have no need to use ebola.
Dem africans need to get dem house in order. Dem buying arms all over de place and killing one another so de west have no need to use ebola.
whoaaaaaaaaaaa boqui has maps on backfoot
have who on wat backfoot. I have no time with stupid commentary.
if man making ah joke at least put up a smiley. if not that is nonsense!
if man making ah joke at least put up a smiley. if not that is nonsense!
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=91510.msg577970#msg577970 date=1406602131]
have who on wat backfoot. I have no time with stupid commentary.
if man making ah joke at least put up a smiley. if not that is nonsense!
[/quote]
You commentary does mek sense?
De west at fault for everyting - lawd have mercy. Dat stupid.
have who on wat backfoot. I have no time with stupid commentary.
if man making ah joke at least put up a smiley. if not that is nonsense!
[/quote]
You commentary does mek sense?
De west at fault for everyting - lawd have mercy. Dat stupid.
Quote:De west at fault for everyting - lawd have mercy. Dat stupid.
yuh jess doh understand di'ze all!
Enlightenment is reserved for the cherished few and alas I am forced to accept I am not one of those.
you should keep quiet or upgrade your commentary. the more you speak the worse you read.
suggestion: find an approach to the bundle of facts or the process we call reality and try to make some sense of it..look for a basis that promotes clarity, increases understanding. if on is not good enough, or proves so then try another.
experience should prove which is more workable than another, more basic or fundamental and help you to greater understanding than you currently display.
demonstration: read drudge report..then black agenda report/read ketchims professor Nye then read CLR James. compare.
but you know James. you even knew of his wife Webb, whom I did know of but forgot. she is not important. if you know James you should be able to speak more informed than you do.
you playing some kind of unnecessary game as usual :
suggestion: find an approach to the bundle of facts or the process we call reality and try to make some sense of it..look for a basis that promotes clarity, increases understanding. if on is not good enough, or proves so then try another.
experience should prove which is more workable than another, more basic or fundamental and help you to greater understanding than you currently display.
demonstration: read drudge report..then black agenda report/read ketchims professor Nye then read CLR James. compare.
but you know James. you even knew of his wife Webb, whom I did know of but forgot. she is not important. if you know James you should be able to speak more informed than you do.
you playing some kind of unnecessary game as usual :
From The Archives
Older threads about similar topics
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)