White Farmers Banned From Owning Land In Zimbabwe

[quote author=ketchim link=topic=91072.msg574188#msg574188 date=1404857107]
Okay,

The Iroquois want back Toronto.

and Geronimo want back New York...

from the Paleface...
[/quote]

And the Huron tribe want back that reservation where the Iroquois are living on now...and so on and so forth. 8)

[quote author=Snoopster link=topic=91072.msg574187#msg574187 date=1404857093]

So if it wasn't a problem, why didn't he use that mechanism instead of extra-judicial violence?

And you don't have to play coy Maps.  You know fully well Mugabe armed those so-called "war veterans" who brutally used violence to evict those farmers.
[/quote] TO EVICT THOSE WHITE FARMERS,

BTW....de buck people want back Essequibo ( Snoopstah birthplace )

[quote author=Snoopster link=topic=91072.msg574190#msg574190 date=1404857245]

And the Huron tribe want back that reservation where the Iroquois are living on now...and so on and so forth. 8)
[/quote]  What next , giving back Guyana to dem  buck man 8).?

[quote author=Kwami link=topic=91072.msg574193#msg574193 date=1404857427]
  What next , giving back Guyana to dem  buck man 8) .?
[/quote]

By yours and Maps' reasoning, why not? 8)

In fact Kwami, you and Maps will both be violently evicted by Billy Two Willies and Shep Proudfoot tomorrow for unlawfully occupying their grandfather's land.

[quote author=Kwami link=topic=91072.msg574191#msg574191 date=1404857275]
TO EVICT THOSE WHITE FARMERS,
[/quote]

You CAN evict people with a court order and a sheriff - lawfully.

I don't know why this concept is so hard for you gentlemen to grasp.

[quote author=Snoopster link=topic=91072.msg574196#msg574196 date=1404857803]
You CAN evict people with a court order and a sheriff - lawfully.

I don't know why this concept is so hard for you gentlemen to grasp.
[/quote] I done ... agree to disagree ;D

[quote author=Kwami link=topic=91072.msg574198#msg574198 date=1404857914]
I done ... agree to disagree ;D
[/quote]

Ok Bro. 8)

Quote:What fcukeries you chatting Maps?

you see I dont understand you.  you represent western law..magna carta and all dat.. but you are not being fair.

there is a long line of horror, suffering and loss over a century from the theft of the land. but due to a change in the social power a chance appears to redress that problem because the nation has a responsibility to resolve it.  it is a national issue of the greatest scope and importance caused by invasion and settler expropriation of a people by force.

but after a hundred years and many legal attempts according to what you call law..the law by which you operate.. the problem remains due to YOUR side's intransigence and refusal to live up to deals to resolve the issue, made according to law..again YOUR law!

but also those descendants of the original criminals refuse to budge, hold on the the land their fore-fathers  stole and benefit from it, fight the people, even kill them in their efforts to get back their land in their current generations.

what the hell is that if its not obstruction of justice..for what is justified in the situation but the people getting back their land ::confused::

that is not only aiding and abetting historical crime etc., but also obstruction of justice..BUT YOU WONT ADMIT THAT! 

AND IF IT IS NOT  OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN YOUR LAW THEN YOUR LAW IS AN ASS!

AND IF THE CURRENT GENERATION OF SETTLER DESCENDANTS HOLD ON TO THE LAND, BENEFIT FROM IT, PARTICIPATE IN EFFORTS TO FRUSTRATE THE PEOPLE IN THEIR EFFORTS TO GET BACK THEIR LAND, EVEN KILL THEM IN THE PROCESS.. THEN THEY ARE CULPABLE IN THE ORIGINAL CRIME AND CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE CRIME OF THEIR FOREBEARS.

and if  the people of Zimbabwe move to take back the land... remember that the popular will, and participation of the general public in the general action, in the movement to take back the land.. is basic law as far as I know.  if the action stands.. then it is the popular will that it stand..it is what the people want and so it stands as law..an accomplished fact.

that I know to be the law..like when the people carry out a revolution and it stands, then the world recognises the new dispensation because it stands, solidifies itself.  and if it does it is the popular will.. so recognition must follow

if you want to look at a popular movement and single out any group and call them what you will..thugs, bullers, zami-makers etc., using them to call the general movement limited and unrepresentaive.. that is your affair.  again you have to prove it..prove that it is a fact and that it is not your propaganda against the popular movement