Supreme Court-Police and cellphones

Captain · 06-25-2014, 01:36 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
WASHINGTON — In a major statement on privacy rights in the digital age, the Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously ruled that the police need warrants to search the cellphonse of people they arrest.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the court, said the vast amount of data contained on modern cellphones must be protected from routine inspection.

The old rules, Chief Justice Roberts said, cannot be applied to “modern cellphones, which are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy.”

The courts have long allowed warrantless searches in connection with arrests, saying they are justified by the need to protect police officers and to prevent the destruction of evidence.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

Jeffrey L. Fisher on Tuesday.Justices Appear Divided on Cellphone WarrantsAPRIL 29, 2014
But Chief Justice Roberts said neither justification made much sense in the context of cellphones. On the other side of the balance, he said, is the data contained on the typical cellphone. Ninety percent of Americans have them, he wrote, and they contain “a digital record of nearly every aspect of their lives — from the mundane to the intimate.”

#2
VERY INFORMATIVE POST CAPTAIN.


AAAAAHHH. YOU COMING AROUND EH. 

gOOD GOING!  KEEP IT UP Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin

#3
eh , eh ....Cappo post a Supreme court  ruling on a current issue ???

oh maaannnn.....This Forum is improving its standards  8)

#4
Can you believe there have been police stops in which drivers were stopped for speeding, and the cops searched their cell phones. I can hardly believe it took this long to reach the US Supreme Court.
Think about some poor boy who had stupid drug dealers call on his cell phone and was put into prison because of those connections.

Worse, like in the movies. The drug dealer kills the stupid boy so that boy can never testify against him. All of that was due to some nosy cop stopping a stupid boy for speeding.

#5
Once they dont get my digits IF dem pull ovah my dealer  >Sad

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)