Sterling: Blacks Don't Help Anybody

Meseret so caught up in her ethical haze she run gone in the face of truth?

Meseret have Guyana well brought up person ethics she basing all she comments on in sat broughtupcy. but that is outside of how the world actually is.

Meseret never saw the parks of Toronto for a long while all full of bullers in the bushes having hollowed out trails where they would meet and eff..prostitution.  you take your children to the park on a sunny day and you see and you have to go home because you don't want your children to see that.

if you go down in the wood today.  I mean its all over the place, aggressive homosexuals flaunting everything in the face of the world.  has Meseret ever experience a gay pride parade to see what goes on in it..to get a real sense of the people she advocates for

then there is the question of racism and the myriad ways ti expresses itself..like my pardnah, married to a white woman for years and she get sick he by her bedside and she awakens asking what is that ****** doing in my room.  and he had to leave so she could calm down.

I am going to do what place black children in the hands of homosexuals to raise?

I would have to be a fool to do or condone any dam foolishness like that.  no children at all far less black children.  Meseret came up fine in this world...it is clear she does not have a clue as what it id like growing up in a s***ty situation.

[size=14pt]NOW!  HAS ANGELINA JOLIE ABUSED ANY OF HER CHILDREN..BIOLOGICAL AND ADOPTED ::confused::[/size]

I WOULD RATHER HAVE A SEXUALLY SATISFIED WOMAN RAISING MY CHILDREN THAN A SEXUALLY REPRESSED ONE.  I AM COOL WITH ANGELINA.  SHE IS EXPERIENCED..SHE KNOWS LIFE, WHAT TO DO AND CAN BRING UP THOSE CHILDREN SMART, SET THEM UP RIGHT  ABOUT THE REAL WORLD RIGHT AWAY..SAVE THEM A LOT OF PAIN FROM HAVING TO PAY TO LEARN.  WITH ANGELINA DEH DOH HAVE TO PAY NUTTEN.  SHE CAN TEACH THEM

here is the sexaholic porn queen

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...s-ago.html

Jolies brother..the same one she is supposed to have frenched

http://ca.eonline.com/news/418222/angeli...hild-abuse

homosexual child abuse

http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3

Quote:Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

Quote:Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

now here is an up to date study on abuse of children in homosexual marriages from ther Family Research Council

http://www.frc.org/issuebrief/new-study-...s-research

New Study On Homosexual Parents Tops All Previous Research

Quote:What the Study Found

The study looked at 40 different outcomes, but reported data for children with "lesbian mothers" and those with "gay fathers" separately. Therefore, there actually were 80 outcome measures that could be said to compare children with "homosexual parents" to those from other family structures. When compared with outcomes for children raised by an "intact biological family" (with a married, biological mother and father), the children of homosexuals did worse (or, in the case of their own sexual orientation, were more likely to deviate from the societal norm) on 77 out of 80 outcome measures. (The only exceptions: children of "gay fathers" were more likely to vote; children of lesbians used alcohol less frequently; and children of "gay fathers" used alcohol at the same rate as those in intact biological families).

Of course, anyone who has had a college course in statistics knows that when a survey shows there are differences between two groups, it is important to test whether that finding is "statistically significant." This is because it is always possible, by chance, that a sample may not accurately reflect the overall population on a particular point. However, through statistical analysis researchers can calculate the likelihood of this, and when they have a high level of confidence that a difference identified in the survey represents an actual difference in the national population, we say that finding is "statistically significant." (This does not mean the other findings are unimportant--just that we cannot have as high a level of confidence in them.)

Regnerus has analyzed his findings, and their statistical significance, in two ways--first by a simple and direct comparison between what is reported by the children of homosexual parents and the children of "intact biological families" ("IBFs"), and second by "controlling" for a variety of other characteristics. "Controlling for income," for example, would mean showing that "IBF" children do not do better just because their married parents have higher incomes, but that they do better even when the incomes of their households and the households of homosexual parents are the same. Again, Regnerus has done these comparisons for "LMs" (children of "lesbian mothers") and "GFs" (children of gay fathers) separately.

There are eight outcome variables where differences between the children of homosexual parents and married parents were not only present, and favorable to the married parents, but where these findings were statistically significant for both children of lesbian mothers and "gay" fathers and both with and without controls. While all the findings in the study are important, these are the strongest possible ones--virtually irrefutable. Compared with children raised by their married biological parents (IBF), children of homosexual parents (LM and GF):

Are much more likely to have received welfare (IBF 17%; LM 69%; GF 57%)
Have lower educational attainment
Report less safety and security in their family of origin
Report more ongoing "negative impact" from their family of origin
Are more likely to suffer from depression
Have been arrested more often
If they are female, have had more sexual partners--both male and female
The high mathematical standard of "statistical significance" was more difficult to reach for the children of "gay fathers" in this study because there were fewer of them. The following, however, are some additional areas in which the children of lesbian mothers (who represented 71% of all the children with homosexual parents in this study) differed from the IBF children, in ways that were statistically significant in both a direct comparison and with controls. Children of lesbian mothers:

Are more likely to be currently cohabiting
Are almost 4 times more likely to be currently on public assistance
Are less likely to be currently employed full-time
Are more than 3 times more likely to be unemployed
Are nearly 4 times more likely to identify as something other than entirely heterosexual
Are 3 times as likely to have had an affair while married or cohabiting
Are an astonishing 10 times more likely to have been "touched sexually by a parent or other adult caregiver."
Are nearly 4 times as likely to have been "physically forced" to have sex against their will
Are more likely to have "attachment" problems related to the ability to depend on others
Use marijuana more frequently
Smoke more frequently
Watch TV for long periods more frequently
Have more often pled guilty to a non-minor offense

this is who the Family Research Council is: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Research_Council

FRC is an anti-gay organization and their point of vie is biased.  but the study appears to be valid.  I will stand on it for the moment

Another study:


http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthroc...revisited/

homosexual people have a lot of problems.  they are often..way too often victims of homosexual molestation as children which adds to my point and position..that homosexual adoption is wrong

Very ignorant! I hope the whole family gets kicked out of the NBA and loses the team.

who would place a $$$ value on the team

The team is reportedly worth upwards of $500 Million