Sterling: Blacks Don't Help Anybody

[quote author=mapoui link=topic=89657.msg563442#msg563442 date=1400002914]
thats a troll any way googs lee.  that is expert trolling or fishing fuh comes'
::LOL:: ::LOL:: ::LOL::

dat is the basis..he job description..defending things like GMO.  he works for Monsanto
:-[
[/quote]

thanks for the job description, boss.

can we get yours? 

Maps, you do know that Jolie once .... (probably still although I can't confirm)


- used drugs
- was in a lesbo relationship
- did porn movies (so I heard)
- screwed more men than can be counted
- wore a vial of someone else's blood around her neck
- french kissed her brother




and you think she is more eligible to adopt children, black or otherwise, than two men who are in a committed relationship?  just because they are men? 

Quote:and you think she is more eligible to adopt children, black or otherwise, than two men who are in a committed relationship?  just because they are men? 

[size=18pt]Yes![/size]    because they are bullers!

If that is your only logic, then it's no use discussing with you.  Carry on.

whu you are so liberal

Quote:- used drugs
- was in a lesbo relationship
- did porn movies (so I heard)
- screwed more men than can be counted
- wore a vial of someone else's blood around her neck
- french kissed her brother

let me tell yu this:

drugs in the western world since 1945 is a rite of passage.  few reach adulthood without full experience with drug.  I would wager real good money that none of western leaders were then and are now, currently without drugs of soem sort.  poor people, working class people, students cant afford cocaine and the ral expensive drugs yet there is a market.  I wonder who that market is

I dont know about bulling for men but lesbianism is now a rite of passage for women.  they all dally at the very least

if you cant prove the porn we wont hold it against her...until we know for sure

I wont hold sex against her either,  sex is an obsessional drive input so by nature which is concerned about reproduction not human religious values or general ethics.  she has a high sex drive..good for her.  some dont. so sorry for them

can you prove the blood in the vial of blood::confused::  now that could be/would be problematic.

I am not concerned about kissing her brother.  incest is legal in most of the world..and of increasing incidence and legality in the USA in particular.

gays have been around forever too.  how is it ok for her to be a lesbian but not for a man to be gay?


Maps kyer you rass with your double standards.


I am done with this.

Magic Johnson in CNN exclusive: I won't hold a grudge against Donald Sterling

Quote:If that is your only logic, then it's no use discussing with you.  Carry on.

so yo cast my logic into the bin eh. why not continue so you can get a real good look at it ::confused::

look we are all products of an ongoing exploitative society that has emphasized the worst in human behaviour for centuries.  I do not know of anyone who can be trusted with any thing at all currently.  and from what I see on the streets every day no one at all trusts any other..period..and in all things.

I have seen how every body came up.  for years I was around Toronto and I saw bullers every day..and night for a while.  I was born and grew in Titty..an awful place.  I have lived over the west indian region and Canada.  I know western New York going east to New York City like the back of my had.  same way all of western Ontario.  I have lived and I know men..and women.

there is nothing you point out about Jolie that is unusual.  I can tell you stories woman..stories.

you are bringing to bear on the issue an ethical level that does not apply at.  there are very few people in the world that good.  and none of the bullers or lesbians or whoever are anywhere close to what you imply or argue.  you must be drunk or what.  you dont know this world at all.

angela jolie is a woman..women and children are a natural.  she carry chirren in she bell and make them.  thats a whole different ball game 99% of the time.  makes all the difference in the world.  Jolie has had her won children and the adopted ones for years.  what has the scrutiny revealed..that she is a bad mother?

come on!  she is in a spotlight!  has she been a bad mother?

I am not approaching this issue with any moral or ethical sensibilities that would blind me to the truth.  I was a child myself and I know the hell I went through with bad people dominating me.  none of the sisters I had who terrorized my fuc'ing life kissed their brothers or took drugs..they drank likker like anyone else they were not drunks...but they effed a lot, had children.  and if I had a choice to be brought up by them which I was..or Angelina Jolie I would chose Jolie hands down

Quote:gays have been around forever too.  how is it ok for her to be a lesbian but not for a man to be gay?


Maps kyer you rass with your double standards.

no no no Meseret!  I have not passed any judgement on gays as such!  I never said to be gay is not ok.  look I have written a lot about gays on this board but maybe you have not seen what I have said..my whole point of view.

I don't see that there is anything to judge about being gay..unless you choose to be gay.  Real gays..not those who play around with gay...do not choose to be gay.  so how can they be blamed for being gay or judged when they had no choice?

same reason why I have not mentioned that gayness lead nowhere..is a dead end.

they question is how does society handle gays.  and as I have said before my position is that they be given all that is due to them...even marriage.  but I see gay as a temporary situation that does in fact lead to a dead end so I don't see a future as such for it.  science will soon understand the biology involved and would be able to correct it early, in the womb.

and if the cause is environmental it would require lifestyle change to prevent the condition from developing.

so it is question of full human rights right now, currently..and see no problem with that.  but there is a gay lobby in the usa that is backed by serious money that is pushing the gay lifestyle as an alternative.  they have pushed gay into our faces, all over life, pushing it internationally causing pain to countries on the way they handle their gay issues. they are dictating to nations with the power of the US government behind them with real punishments sanctions and so for not handling things they way they want

Gay is now part of american diplomacy that forces open countries for american interests.  why are they pushing gay to this extent?  why the force and the power behind it.....do they want to make the whole freaking world gay?  gay is a big issue between Russia and the USA at the moment..a fighting issue.  whatever in the hell for ::confused::

in america to be is to be hero now.  look at how this Sam fella is all over the place kissing his boyfriend.  well to much f that is a problem.  we have to work this thing so that we all can feel comfortable with situation without infringing basic rights

I go a long way on the gay issue in their favour but the way but i know human beings I would be very careful if at all placing adopted children in the hands of gay male couples.

look here... the world is horrific for children.  Russia banned totally the adoption of Russian children out of Russia..ABSOLUTELY NONE AT ALL TO THE USA DUE TO THE RECORDED EXPERIENCE OF THESE CHILDREN.  HAVE YOU SEEN THE HORRENDOUS CASE HISTORIES OF WHAT BECAME OF A GREAT DEAL OF THOSE CHILDREN ::confused::

LOOK AMERICAN ADOPTED A GREAT DEAL OF CHILDREN WHO SIMPLY DISAPPEARED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.  HOW DID THAT HAPPEN ::confused::  THE SPECULATION IS THAT THEY WERE ADOPTED FOR THE BODY PARTS TRADE.

AND THE HOMOSEXUAL MEN I HAVE SEEN ALL OVER THE PLACE..THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GETTING CHILDREN TO MIND ::confused::

nuts!  that would not happen had I anything to do with the issue.  I would make the orphan service much better to take the children right through to high school graduation and we will see from there.

no homosexual adoption!