[quote author=TRINIDADDY link=topic=89243.msg560913#msg560913 date=1398553624]
Chanderpaul's career strike rate, in tests, is 43. He's always been a slow accumulator.
[/quote] Maybe so but where are those with spectacular strike and accumulation rates .'?
Shiv has been there for well near 20 years and those flashy types are in oblivion
We talking strike rates. Chanderpaul's international test average is 51, his strike rate is 43. That is a slow strike rate.
You and Mail are typical Trinis ....talking thru your arse
Trinidadians only talk through their butt because their mouth always full of food.
and sullying the reputation of a Guyanese and West Indian Great !
A global great too. Chanderpaul is basically our Dravid. He bats slow and he makes runs. Batting slow and making runs is okay. The problem is batting slow and making no runs. Which leads us to...
Maybe so but where are those with spectacular strike and accumulation rates .'?
Shiv has been there for well near 20 years and those flashy types are in oblivion
What flashy types? Marlon Samuels strike rate in tests is in the 40s, Darren Bravo in the 40s, Sarwan in the 40s. As a comparison, Dravid's is 43 and Sangakkara's is 54. West Indies now have no "flashy" test batsmen with "spectacular strike rates". The closest is Gayle in the 50s, and even that is behind the 60-70 odd strike-rates of dominators like Lara and Sir Vivian "I dont have time for this sh*t" Richards.
WI test problems isn't that they have flashy players with no substance, its that they got a bunch of slow batsmen who get out at 30.