Substitute can wicket keep ?

ketchim · 03-25-2014, 12:52 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
IF so , we have Charles and Fletcher

Ramdin injured ...

Why Simmo put on the Gloves ?  :-\

#2
Charles swap with Simmo in the Outfield .

Simmo is a better Out Fielder !

Charles is a fair glove man for his country !

#3
does Gibson knows this

#4
Pybus might .... :-[

#5
4 wicketkeepers present :

Johnson Charles
Andre Fletcher
Phil Simmons
Dinesh Ramdin.

Charles and Fletch keeps for their respective Islands.

Simmons do NOT.

Ramdin injured fielding up to seamer Santokie....just fingers !




#6
Substitutes can't keep wickets AFAIK. You'd have to pick someone from the XI.
And yeah, among them if one had to be picked, I'd choose Charles.

#7
[quote author=The Captain link=topic=88628.msg556432#msg556432 date=1395764004]
does Gibson knows this
[/quote]

What do you reckon ?? ..........

Too busy flapping his gums !!!  ::yawn::

#8
[quote author=Kyle link=topic=88628.msg556533#msg556533 date=1395802477]

Substitutes can't keep wickets AFAIK. You'd have to pick someone from the XI.
[/quote]

not nice... think this is the same for Catcher/ backstopper in Baseball

OR  Goalies in other sports ?  :-\

#9
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=88628.msg556579#msg556579 date=1395846697]
not nice... think this is the same for Catcher/ backstopper in Baseball

OR  Goalies in other sports ?  :-\
[/quote]
I have no idea about baseball, is that right? Anyway get what you mean, but I guess otherwise it would be too convenient you know? Like wicketkeeper is something teams take into serious consideration while picking the XI. If keepers were allowed to be substituted, then it's easy - like they'd play a specialist batsman and he could just pretend to be ill and bam, you have a specialist keeper.

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)