What do they know of cricket... By Fazeer Mohammed

Chin · 01-27-2014, 02:13 PM · 1 person reading this discussion

#11
The LSE does not make you corrupt.

#12
[quote author=Mail link=topic=87238.msg546406#msg546406 date=1390866118]
Mr. Mohammed asked the question, he did not suggest.


The important point is what has the West Indian administrators done to elevate their influence on the Global stage especially in the days of dominance?


Answer, nothing.


What is your point about the Negga thing?


All this article says to me is that this triumvirate is nothing new except there is anew master in India. The stronger nations have always ran the game.


I do not know if, as as agent provocateur,  you aim to be stupid or you are just really stupid.
[/quote] I will never be able to get through to you that black people are never accepted as full human beings by the power structure .
Check out your own Duggan  inquiry and  you will see  what I  am talking about

#13
Mail , if you think that I  have a chip on my shoulder , you are wrong .... I 've got a log

#14
Ramesh,


How long have Black people been in charge of West indies Cricket and what have they done with it?


The Indians had no influence whatsoever but look now.


You cannot have a large population and be influential, you have to be resourceful as the Indians have been.


They are not being marginalised and I am sure they did not go around whinging and moaning, they just got on with it.


Revisit redemption song.

#15
[quote author=Mail link=topic=87238.msg546413#msg546413 date=1390866764]
The LSE does not make you corrupt.
[/quote] The London school of economics produce many dictators in Africa . The do however produce some good ones now and then like the Honourable Forbes Burnham

#16
ramesh ,

U are better advised not to use LFS as advertisement for LSE !

LSE to quote Mail " does not make you Corrupt "  Wink

#17
The LSE does not produce the people and their corrupt ideas, they teach Economics.


How idiotic.


You are indeed a fool at best.


Forbes Burnham divided the Guyanese people and destroyed the country.


However if he is your hero, there is no wonder why you speak anything but sense.

#18
[quote author=Mail link=topic=87238.msg546416#msg546416 date=1390867478]
Ramesh,


How long have Black people been in charge of West indies Cricket and what have they done with it?


The Indians had no influence whatsoever but look now.


You cannot have a large population and be influential, you have to be resourceful as the Indians have been.


They are not being marginalised and I am sure they did not go around whinging and moaning, they just got on with it.


Revisit redemption song.
[/quote] You believe that you are dealing with a cretin in Ramesh , but let me explain to you why  Indian cricket and influence ascended . I will educate you in History
In 1993 Manmohman Singh liberalised the Indian economy and lifted currency controls and at the same time India with  the support of the South Asians countries , Zimbabwe and the West Indies forced Australia and England to requenlish    it's veto powers in the ICC and Indian cricket took off re huge TV deals etc.

#19
[quote author=Mail link=topic=87238.msg546419#msg546419 date=1390868159]
The LSE does not produce the people and their corrupt ideas, they teach Economics.


How idiotic.


You are indeed a fool at best.


Forbes Burnham divided the Guyanese people and destroyed the country.


However if he is your hero, there is no wonder why you speak anything but sense.
[/quote] How many did Burnham killed compared to the  war criminal Tony Blair , who killed millions in Iraq  ?

#20
Your initial comment was about the wonder of Burnham rather than a comparison with Blair or anyone else.


However Blair was culpable with the Americans in contravening a UN resolution about invading Iraq on the basis of WMD which they never found.


Despicable and totally abhorrent and he should have been tried for War crimes as should the imbecile Bush.


By the way killing one person is like killing all of humanity where ever and by whoever.


Might I suggest you stick with the topic in hand and the points you make.


Burnham, like Manning have been very bad for their people.


 

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)