It is true you need better performing players to give yourself the best chance to compete and win.
However you cannot manufacture what you do not readily have overnight.
The solution lies in addressing far deeper rooted issues and since many of those issues will not be resolved because of, amongst others, protectionism, the future does not look promising.
There is much evidence to suggest the administration was equally cumbersome in the period of dominance so that said structure, and its increasing unwieldiness, is even less capable of dealing with and resolving problems in lean times. That structure was sustained by genuinely God gifted players churning out dominant results for a long time.
It would appear very little progress have been made under the current leadership, despite what might be their best efforts and intentions, so changes are required now as a sustained length of time has already been allowed to them with no marked returns.
Therefore the offices of the Coach, Captain and Selectors must surely come under serious question.
In the face of events, it appears no one will do the right thing and step down so the real question might be, is there the will from those above, Director of Cricket upwards, to make those immediate changes?
From what I have seen, the latter seems highly unlikely so the chaos may continue.
This is a significant challenge Pybus' faces and the manner in which he deals with this will underline his tenure. A baptism of fire...
Pybus' record shows he is no push over, having left previous posts for not being allowed to execute those things he was employed to do, so I do not expect him to sit back and be a yes man.
Even if changes are made following the New Zealand tour, expectations have to be managed.
It is protocol to involve the Coach in shaping the future but given what has happened, is Gibson best placed to be part of that process?
However you cannot manufacture what you do not readily have overnight.
The solution lies in addressing far deeper rooted issues and since many of those issues will not be resolved because of, amongst others, protectionism, the future does not look promising.
There is much evidence to suggest the administration was equally cumbersome in the period of dominance so that said structure, and its increasing unwieldiness, is even less capable of dealing with and resolving problems in lean times. That structure was sustained by genuinely God gifted players churning out dominant results for a long time.
It would appear very little progress have been made under the current leadership, despite what might be their best efforts and intentions, so changes are required now as a sustained length of time has already been allowed to them with no marked returns.
Therefore the offices of the Coach, Captain and Selectors must surely come under serious question.
In the face of events, it appears no one will do the right thing and step down so the real question might be, is there the will from those above, Director of Cricket upwards, to make those immediate changes?
From what I have seen, the latter seems highly unlikely so the chaos may continue.
This is a significant challenge Pybus' faces and the manner in which he deals with this will underline his tenure. A baptism of fire...
Pybus' record shows he is no push over, having left previous posts for not being allowed to execute those things he was employed to do, so I do not expect him to sit back and be a yes man.
Even if changes are made following the New Zealand tour, expectations have to be managed.
It is protocol to involve the Coach in shaping the future but given what has happened, is Gibson best placed to be part of that process?