SUNIL PHILIP NARINE: What To Expect

Rev Al · 12-17-2013, 04:44 PM · 3 people reading this discussion

#51
[size=18pt]PERMAUL GETS HIS FIRST WICKET[/size]

NZ 224/5


Quote:Permaul to Anderson, OUT, and Permaul strikes against the run-of-play as Anderson looks for the heave through midwicket, but hits it square as Deonarine, at deep square leg, takes a low catch to dismiss the left-hander. That one seemingly came out of the blue as New Zealand are now five down


Corey J Anderson c Deonarine b Permaul 39 (62b 7x4 0x6) SR: 62.90
 

#52
35 outta 90 overs bowled by Narine !

#53
[size=14pt]Sunil Philip Narine would have gotten a wicket if they had reviewed----Southee was out LBW----NOT OUT decision by umpire would have been reversed.[/size]

NZ 306/7

Narine 3/86

#54
[size=18pt]Sunil Philip Narine nails his 4th wicket.[/size]



Quote:Narine to Southee, OUT, that looks close, and is given immediately, Southee caught half forward to an offbreak, rapped on the knee roll, replays show that hitting middle and off, and it is umpire's call for point of impact, just on the line of off, and Southee has to go after the review  

TG Southee lbw b Narine 18 (26b 2x4 1x6) SR: 69.23


NZ 317/8

Narine 38-15-86-4

Rev

#55
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTpwVAXjkdIeFgKo09KvFA...Vg0lvhJ4oR]

[size=14pt]Can Sunil Philip Narine get a 5er ?[/size]

NZ 321/8

Narine 39-15-90-4

#56
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS6h6ghuycNUNXDUb6hw1N...VkYJgtuomT]

[size=14pt]Excellent! Sunil Philip Narine gets his 5er[/size]

NZ 332/9

Narine 41-15-91-5

#57
[size=14pt]In the meantime Verasammy Permaul is looking very, very, very ordinary---Permaul is not a test bowler---in fact, Deonarine is a better bowler than Permaul.[/size]

Rev

#58
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQNQvjMrAxubyucWp3bEHW...KfhVJS-1ww]

[size=14pt]6 wickets for Sunil Philip Narine[/size]

NZ 349/10

Narine 42-17-91-6

Rev

#59
                                [Image: 174679.jpg]

#60
During the last CPL and CT20 tournaments, Narine was more entertaining to watch bowl than all the batsmen batting. There were some passages where he was simply dazling.

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)