KE
ketchim
Legend
Joined Apr 2008
Posts 89,928
[size=12pt]In a discussion following Mike Brearley's Bradman Oration for 2013, Rodney Marsh offered the suggestion that :
Twenty20 matches be restricted to players over the age of 30. [/size]
KE
ketchim
Legend
Joined Apr 2008
Posts 89,928
Such a scenario would lengthen the careers of those players who reached their later years
with physical and mental baggage, while also eradicating the current trouble most nations
are experiencing around grooming young players for three wildly disparate formats.
KE
ketchim
Legend
Joined Apr 2008
Posts 89,928
A wise man said to me not that long ago that you shouldn't be allowed to play Twenty20 cricket
until you're 30," Marsh said.
"And if you just stop and think about that, I don't think that's a bad solution.
Maybe it should be the topping on the cake after your career, after you've fought your guts out
for your country, after you've given everything to the real form of the game, then you get your
rewards by playing the short form of the game. I'm not saying I agree with it necessarily,
but I'm not saying I disagree with it.
In fact I'm sitting on the fence." 8)
KE
ketchim
Legend
Joined Apr 2008
Posts 89,928
West Indies would be in a Predicament ? :-\
KE
ketchim
Legend
Joined Apr 2008
Posts 89,928
USA names a 41 year old Guyanese as their T20 Captain !
and a 38 year old fast bowler ...
Mail
Unregistered
Joined N/A
Posts N/A
Rep
I thought the basis for the suggestion would be to hone the skills of young players.....!!!
KE
ketchim
Legend
Joined Apr 2008
Posts 89,928
I am sure that the idea is not to have Sloggers too early in their cricket Life ..
Kyle
Unregistered
Joined N/A
Posts N/A
Rep
Yeah posing it as some sort of prize for "fighting the guts out for your country" is duh, what ridiculous reasoning. I thought he'd have been thinking of good chunk of young players turning into inadeqaute sloggers and failing at the test level. But think that's far from what he's saying here.