Swastika?

Gully · 11-13-2012, 03:36 PM · 3 people reading this discussion

#11
and:  was hitler really a bad man :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes:


:grin: :grin: :grin:
:grin: :grin:
:grin:

#12
The white man took our sacred hindu symbol and corrupt it with evil

#13
Chinese, African, German and Hindu :

can fight over a Symbol  :blank:

#14
.. at least they have not touched the symbol Aum as of yet

#15
that could be the new word for the bombers


aum  aum  aum


booom

#16
I'm fairly certain that pre-war scout badges in England had Swastikas on them as well.

#17
[quote author=ketchim link=topic=73848.msg457296#msg457296 date=1352916421]
Chinese, African, German and Hindu :

can fight over a Symbol  :blank:
[/quote]


I don't care who fight over things.  stupid pipple ::rofl:: ::rofl::


I am the basis of all human life.  all is mine! Angel Angel Angel
::rofl:: ::rofl:: ::rofl:: ::rofl::


everything belongs to all.. because all are the same.... from the same root. argument over ownership is moot
:cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy:

#19
[quote author=The Captain link=topic=73848.msg457353#msg457353 date=1352930787]
??????
[/quote]


I KNOW YU WUD HAVE A HARD TIME WITH THIS.  WAT EXACTLY WUD YOU LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT IT?

#20
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=73848.msg457313#msg457313 date=1352922442]

I don't care who fight over things.  stupid pipple ::rofl:: ::rofl::


I am the basis of all human life.  all is mine! Angel Angel Angel
::rofl:: ::rofl:: ::rofl:: ::rofl::


everything belongs to all.. because all are the same.... from the same root. argument over ownership is moot
:cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy:
[/quote]


what I mean captain is that this should spur a real nice and clarifying debate here for us all but it wont because there is too much belief and emotion, national and racial chauvinisms still attached to these things


I don't know if the nazi symbol is africa in the sense that it originated in early african cultures..the first cultures in the world.  I have seen nothing to that effect.


so far the swastika is Indian..but very early Indian.  'they' also talk about Sumerian..5000 bc.  the questions arise:  what were the populations of early Sumer and the Indus valley? 


who were those originals of Sumer and India, where did they come from and what evidence of themselves did they leave?


increasingly I personally do not care about origins in any chauvinistic sense.  more and more I see humanity as a whole things, from an original location spreading out to populate the planet. 


humanity originated in Africa and all flows from that location through-out the planet.


therefore we are all african. and we have been a lil unlucky that the age of discovery or our origins coincides with a racial capitalism that has used all knowledge to solidify its domination, and not consistent with liberation of the human species from ignorance, war, insecurity and social division along class and racial lines


human history must be approached in the sense that that story is whole and it is..codified that way and taught as the whole that it is to the children of the world..the whole, and the parts related to the whole.


so when I say it all belongs to me I mean that I am african, the base, the root so all is from me  and all is mine.


but then again I point out we are all african so it belongs to all of us too..which is why people fighting over objects and symbols is nonsense. 


human heritage is the term to use..the applicable one.. human heritage, a fact of human development on the way to our current stage of development..establishing the flow of social development for original points up through areas and regions to our day

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)