Public Service

mapoui · 10-15-2012, 01:12 PM

#2
well
what am going to have for lunch

#3
Have GMO! 


Who stopping you?


al I do is give you wats goin' orn.  eat away :tongue: :tongue: :tongue: :tongue: :tongue: .




(ever hear the word organic....and the old habit of cooking at home and walking wit' yuh lunch.  good ole' habits die fast eh! :Rolleyes:  )

#4
when all these white people are against something , then I am certain that it must be good for black people .  White people throughout  history has never done anything  that is in the interest on people who are not white

#5
[quote author=Kwami link=topic=72425.msg449830#msg449830 date=1350318821]
when all these white people are against something , then I am certain that it must be good for black people .  White people throughout  history has never done anything  that is in the interest on people who are not white
[/quote]


then eat on brother.  enjoy :tongue: :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:

#6

#7
the most obvious and simple rule of existence seems to me the following:


"when a risk contains terminal and irreversible potential it is best to avoid until one is certain either way it can be or go!" :grin: :grin: :grin:


what's with this arguing to the contrary when based on easily verifiable general historical knowledge long in the public domain..THE THE ACCUSED, THE RICH PEOPLE, THE JEWS..ARE EASILY CAPABLE OF DOING THE DEED OF POISONING THE FOOD SUPPLY TO BRING ABOUT POPULATION REDUCTION AS CLAIMED BY SO MANY? :lipsrsealed:


if you eat the damm food and it turns out that it is indeed poisoned you and your family are wiped out.  if you force them to prove that it is indeed good food what's there to lose? ::redcard::


what is simply being asked is to lable the blasted food.  why wont they? what's there to hide?


why do they insist on releasing the plant products without proper recorded and freely available research into their safety?


does not the  major corporation behind GMO foods have a long history of the atrocity and crimes against humanity? Confusedhocked: Confusedhocked: Confusedhocked: Confusedhocked: Confusedhocked:


are you guys truly serious...captain and Kwami? Huh Huh Huh Huh


you both always seemed smarter than that to me :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes:

#8
[quote author=mapoui link=topic=72425.msg449834#msg449834 date=1350319899]
:




 







   

 


you both always seemed smarter than that to me :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes: :Rolleyes:
[/quote] fooled you didnt we ? whatever gives you the impression that we  is smart

#9
[quote author=Kwami link=topic=72425.msg449833#msg449833 date=1350319323]

[/quote]




but if it is safe why does Monsanto handle it the way it does:  why no labling?  why does the whole industry fight labling?

again...why the monopolistic business practices, seed monopolies, banning farmers from collecting seed to planting next year..why terminator seeds and lots more truly horrific treatment of farmers for example?

why the failure of Bst cotton in India leading to so many suicides?

if the technology is so damm good it would stand on its own, create its own great demand with no marketing help of any kind and quality help from its creators. 

as a former businessman I know the value of goodwill.  it cannot be bought and when a product is good it earns a goodwill that is priceless, that is the basis of its own demand. 



if all they say in this video is true then Monsanto and the GMO industry would not have to advertise much, or engage in coercion to get its products across.  everybody would want them.  there would be general success and benefit for all.

the farmers in India for example would have gotten their promised high yields from Bst cotton, won financial success, pay their debts, raise up their families and be still alive today.

but wherever GMO's have been planted there have been all kinds of trouble-problems, quite contrary to all that was said of them..and opposed to general farming expectations.  tons of countries have banned GMO's altogether or have put severe restrictions on them...from actual experience cultivating GMO's

are a these countries mistaken, stupid, incapable, fearful of progress?

and it is not only the seed that is the problem with GMO's.  they are all engineered to cooperate with chemical compounds that attack 'weeds' and so-called pests.  the weed killers and pesticides like Round-up with something called gly-phosphate.. are know to be insanely disruptive of the normal functions of the human body.


this is the question then: GIVEN ALL WE KNOW ABOUT CHEMICAL PESTICIDES AND WEED KILLERS, OVER A LONG PERIOD OF THEIR APPLICATION TO FOOD PRODUCTION...HOW IN  THE HELL DOES FOOD PRODUCTION PROGRESS  COME TO BE MEASURED BY THE APPLICATION OF GREATER AND GREATER QUANTITIES, OF EVEN MORE DEADLY CHEMICALS, TO AGRICULTURE?


fell free to answer my observations and questions at length and depth as soon as allyuh ready...


(who paid for this blasted video?)

#10
I know something about agriculture as well.  merely saying you went to agricultural school what are we supposed to do take your word as given?


well..... what happens when you target a weed with any weed killer..even round-up?


same with so called pests?


and what happens the more extreme you get with the pesticides and weed killers

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)