Supreme Court Support Vaccine

ketchim · 09-09-2021, 10:42 AM · 1 person reading this discussion

#1
In 1905, the high court made a fateful ruling

with eerie parallels to today :

One person’s liberty can’t trump everyone else’s.

#2
The year was 1904 :
One man’s liberty, they declared in a 7-2 ruling handed down
cannot deprive his neighbors of their own liberty
— in this case by allowing the spread of disease

#3
“There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject
for the common good,” read the majority opinion.

“On any other basis, organized society could not exist
with safety to its members
Society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself
would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy.
”

#4
The Constitution’s promise that no state shall

[size=5]“deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”[/size]

#5
“Real liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others.”

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2...ket-newtab

#7
I would love another Current RULING !

From The Archives

Older threads about similar topics


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)